ANSAM rejects Kuki-Zo apology over killing of six Naga hostages in Manipur
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The All Naga Students' Association, Manipur (ANSAM) on Friday, 26 June rejected the apology issued by the Kuki-Zo Council (KZC) over the killing of six Naga hostages in Kangpokpi district, terming it “insincere” and demanding the immediate arrest and prosecution of all those responsible. The rejection came a day after KZC Chairman Henlianthang Thanglet publicly admitted the killings were a “grave mistake” and called for a fair investigation into the ethnic violence gripping Manipur.
ANSAM's Rejection and Key Demands
In a formal statement, ANSAM asserted that the KZC apology neither constituted a genuine admission of guilt nor reflected meaningful accountability for the abduction and killing of the six Naga civilians on 13 May in Kangpokpi. The students’ body made clear that no apology could be considered credible until those involved were identified, arrested, and punished in accordance with the law.
ANSAM also took strong objection to the use of the term “Katcha Nagas” in the KZC statement, describing it as derogatory and offensive to the identity and dignity of the Naga people. The organisation questioned whether the KZC was authorised to issue an apology on behalf of all Kuki-Zo groups, and sought clarification on whether the statement represented the position of all constituent communities, including the Zomis.
The Incident: What Happened on 13 May
The violence that triggered the hostage crisis unfolded on 13 May in Kangpokpi district, when three Thadou church leaders were killed and four others injured. In the aftermath, at least 50 people from both the Kuki and Naga communities were taken hostage by different armed groups across Kangpokpi and Senapati districts.
Around 30 individuals from both communities were released on 14 and 15 May following intervention by authorities, community leaders, and civil society organisations. On 10 June, the remaining 14 Kuki villagers were released and handed to police at a station in Senapati district by the United Naga Council (UNC) and the Naga People’s Organisation (NPO).
The following day, 11 June, the bodies of six Naga hostages were recovered from a forested area near Kharam Vaiphei village, a predominantly Kuki-Zo tribal settlement under the Saitu-Gamphazol Sub-Division of Kangpokpi district. ANSAM described the killings as taking place on ancestral Naga land in Leilon Vaiphei village, calling it a direct attack on the security and dignity of the Naga community.
What the Kuki-Zo Council Said
KZC Chairman Henlianthang Thanglet, addressing the media at Churachandpur district headquarters on Thursday alongside three other leaders, admitted that the Kuki-Zo people had committed a “grave mistake” in killing the six Naga civilians, stating it was done “in a moment of emotion.” He strongly condemned the incident and apologised on behalf of his community.
Describing the killings as “tragic and unacceptable,” Thanglet maintained that the act was neither authorised nor approved by any Kuki-Zo political or community leadership. He called for a fair, transparent, and impartial investigation into all acts of violence linked to the continuing ethnic unrest in the state.
NIA Probe and Government Response
Manipur Chief Minister Yumnam Khemchand Singh had earlier stated that cases relating to the abduction and killing of the six Naga villagers, along with the murder of the three church leaders in Kangpokpi on 13 May, had been handed over to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) for a comprehensive investigation.
ANSAM urged both the Manipur government and the Centre to ensure a speedy probe and bring the perpetrators to justice. It also called for serious consideration of the demands submitted by the United Naga Council, emphasising that justice and accountability were essential for lasting peace and reconciliation. The killings have drawn widespread condemnation from political leaders, civil society groups, and community organisations across the Northeast.
With the NIA now in charge of the investigation, all eyes are on whether the probe will deliver the accountability that both communities and civil society organisations are demanding.