Are the Aravalli mining figures being misrepresented by Ashok Gehlot?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Jaipur, Dec 23 (NationPress) Former Chief Minister of Rajasthan, Ashok Gehlot, raised alarms on Tuesday regarding the statement made by Union Minister Bhupender Yadav, which indicated that only 0.19 percent of fresh mining activities would be allowed in the Aravalli region. Gehlot contended that these statistics may not accurately depict the actual situation and urged for increased transparency.
He mentioned that the Union government’s assertion that mining would be confined to 0.19 percent of the total 1.44 lakh sq km area is potentially misleading, as this area comprises 34 districts with cities, villages, agricultural lands, and plains, in addition to the hills. “The actual Aravalli hill range is not that extensive. Mining operations will occur solely on the hills,” Gehlot emphasized.
Although 0.19 percent may seem minor in relation to the overall area, Gehlot pointed out that it equates to 273.6 sq km, or roughly 68,000 acres. He explained that if small mining leases of one hectare (2.5 acres) each are issued, it could lead to the legal authorization of about 27,200 mines. Gehlot warned that the repercussions of mining extend beyond the sites, as roads, dumping areas, crushers, and dust could adversely impact fertile land, agriculture, and the surrounding ecosystem.
Gehlot also highlighted two amendments to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act (MMDR), which he believes raise concerns about the autonomy of states. He indicated that the MMDR Amendment 2021 permits the Centre to auction mineral blocks if a state does not do so within a specified timeframe, while the MMDR Amendment 2023 grants the Centre authority over minerals categorized as “critical,” such as lithium, copper, and zinc. “In the Aravallis, copper and zinc are found deep underground,” he remarked, adding that private companies might soon receive exploration licenses for extensive mining.
He further expressed worries regarding the alterations in the definitions of minor and major minerals, modifications to protected area boundaries, and the diminishing role of the Central Empowered Committee (CEC). Gehlot referenced the Sariska Protected Area as an instance where changes were attempted in just three days.
“Our argument remains that this is not merely about 0.19 percent. The broader concern is the future of the Aravallis, the environment in Rajasthan, agriculture, and the well-being of future generations. The government needs to clarify whether it aims to safeguard the Aravallis or promote mining activities there,” Gehlot concluded.