Is the Demand for a Muslim Deputy CM in UP Just Symbolic?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a thought-provoking interview, Azam Khan challenges the push for a Muslim Deputy CM in Uttar Pradesh, labeling it as mere symbolism. He argues that true political empowerment cannot be achieved through ceremonial titles. This discussion comes at a critical time for minority representation in Indian politics.
Key Takeaways
- Azam Khan dismisses the demand for a Muslim Deputy CM as a meaningless symbolic gesture.
- The role lacks real authority and does not empower minorities.
- Political representation should be based on substantive policy, not ceremonial titles.
- Khan's comments reflect broader discussions on minority rights in Indian politics.
- He emphasizes the need for genuine empowerment rooted in the Constitution.
New Delhi, Oct 31 (NationPress) Senior Samajwadi Party (SP) leader and former Uttar Pradesh minister Azam Khan has characterized the call for a Muslim Deputy Chief Minister in Uttar Pradesh as a symbolic and constitutionally insignificant endeavor.
In a revealing interview with IANS, the experienced politician contended that the role of Deputy CM lacks genuine authority and thus fails to provide real political empowerment for minorities.
When asked if SP chief Akhilesh Yadav should commit to a Muslim Deputy CM ahead of the upcoming UP Assembly elections in 2027, Khan argued that the Constitution does not acknowledge such a role and considers it merely a symbolic gesture.
“Even in UP, with two Deputy CMs (Keshav Prasad Maurya and Brajesh Pathak), they hold no power; no one pays attention to them. Until the Constitution acknowledges it, the position is devoid of meaning,” he remarked.
These comments arise amid increasing scrutiny regarding Muslim representation in the INDIA Bloc and regional parties. Khan stressed that political empowerment must be based on structure and law, not on symbolic gestures. He reiterated his belief that representation should be substantial, based on policy and authority, rather than ceremonial roles.
In response to allegations against Rampur MP Maulana Mohibullah Nadvi of deceiving multiple women and entering into several marriages, Khan reacted with his typical sarcasm.
“Some can’t manage just one partner; others have many waiting for them; that’s life. A man once told me his 47th wife had just passed away. When asked how, he replied, ‘Each time I marry, the wife dies in three days’. Another claimed, ‘I’m not that fortunate; one is enough to keep me busy’. Everyone has their own fate and lifestyle; who are we to judge?” he quipped, sidestepping a direct comment on the allegations against Nadvi.
This statement is expected to elicit reactions from various political factions, given the sensitivity surrounding the topic and ongoing discussions on personal laws and gender rights.
While Khan suggested that his public engagements have decreased due to health issues and prolonged legal disputes, he affirmed that he has not exited politics. “If I had retired, would you still come to check on me? You only come to see how much light remains in this lamp. The truth is, keeping it lit is no longer in my control.”
Point of View
Azam Khan's remarks highlight a critical discussion on the nature of political representation in India. It is essential to recognize that true empowerment for minorities must extend beyond symbolic roles and be rooted in substantive legal frameworks that ensure equitable participation in governance.
NationPress
04/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Azam Khan's stance on the Muslim Deputy CM issue?
Azam Khan believes that the demand for a Muslim Deputy Chief Minister in Uttar Pradesh is merely a symbolic gesture that lacks constitutional significance and does not empower minorities.
Why does Khan consider the Deputy CM position powerless?
Khan argues that the current Deputy CMs in UP hold no real authority, which undermines the effectiveness of such roles in providing political empowerment.
How does Khan view political representation for minorities?
He maintains that political representation must be meaningful, grounded in policy and authority rather than being ceremonial or symbolic.
What was Khan's response to allegations against Maulana Nadvi?
Khan responded with sarcasm, highlighting different perspectives on personal relationships without directly addressing the allegations.
Is Azam Khan planning to exit politics?
Despite health issues and legal challenges, Khan has stated he has not retired from politics and continues to engage with the public.
