Is Delhi's Batla House Facing Unlawful Demolition Amidst Resident Protests?

Synopsis
Residents of Batla House in Southeast Delhi are facing an uncertain future as demolition notices have been issued amidst claims of procedural violations. With legal actions underway, the community is left grappling with the fear of eviction and seeking clarity on their rights. Will the courts provide them the relief they desperately need?
Key Takeaways
- Batla House residents are facing potential eviction due to recent demolition notices.
- Legal representatives emphasize procedural flaws in the eviction process.
- Supreme Court and Delhi High Court are involved in addressing the situation.
- Residents are encouraged to seek assistance under available government schemes.
- The outcome of this legal battle will significantly impact the community's future.
New Delhi, June 2 (NationPress) Tensions have intensified in the Batla House area of Southeast Delhi as numerous homes and businesses have been marked with red Xs—an alarming sign that residents assert has historically signified impending demolition efforts by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Uttar Pradesh Irrigation Department. This has left countless residents in a state of fear regarding unexpected eviction.
The DDA claims that these actions are in response to a Supreme Court order mandating the removal of encroachments on public land. However, numerous residents contend that proper legal procedures were overlooked. They argue that they were not given the opportunity to establish ownership or provided with alternative rehabilitation options before receiving eviction notifications.
On May 22 and 26, two eviction notices were issued, one by the UP Irrigation Department and the other by the DDA, referencing Khasra numbers 277 and 279 in the impacted area. The suddenness of these actions incited panic among locals, prompting them to pursue legal remedies.
Advocate Adeel Ahmed, representing several affected residents, highlighted significant procedural flaws: “The main issue is that those who received eviction notices concerning Khasra Number 279 were not included in the contempt proceedings. They were served notices without being afforded a hearing. A 15-day notice should have been given to allow them to respond, but instead, the notice required immediate land vacating.”
A petition contesting the demolitions has been submitted to the Supreme Court, which recognized the urgency of the situation and indicated it would be addressed by the regular Bench when court sessions recommence in early July.
AAP MLA Amanatullah Khan confirmed the recent developments: “Today, we have obtained assurance from the Supreme Court that the case will be reviewed by the regular Bench in the first week of July. Until then, those at risk of demolition have been encouraged to seek relief under PM-UDAY or any relevant program and to submit their applications accordingly.”
In a separate ruling, the Delhi High Court has temporarily halted the UP Irrigation Department’s demolition efforts, providing some residents with a brief respite.
As legal proceedings progress, residents remain apprehensive about their future, anxiously awaiting clarity on whether they can remain or will face demolition once court hearings resume.