Why Did the NIA Fail to Present Accused in Beldanga Violence Case for the Second Time?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Kolkata, Feb 12 (NationPress) A team from the National Investigation Agency (NIA) investigating the recent violence in Beldanga, located in the Murshidabad district of minority-dominated West Bengal, was unable to present 36 accused individuals in a special NIA court on Thursday morning.
This marks the second instance where the NIA has been unable to bring the accused to court, primarily due to the Murshidabad district police not providing sufficient police escorts.
Previously, on February 5, the NIA also failed to present the accused in court, with the state police citing insufficient security escorts as the reason.
Reports suggest that despite the NIA submitting a request to the Murshidabad District Police, the latter could not comply due to the deployment of police personnel for the higher secondary examinations conducted by the West Bengal Council of Higher Secondary Education, which commenced on the same day.
The investigation into the Beldanga violence was initiated by the NIA following a directive from the Calcutta High Court, which authorized the Union Home Ministry to proceed with an NIA inquiry. The unrest was reportedly triggered by false news regarding the alleged murder of a migrant worker from Murshidabad in Jharkhand.
Later investigations revealed that the reports about the violence were based on misinformation, with the Jharkhand Police confirming the migrant worker's death was due to suicide, as supported by the post-mortem findings.
In a related development, while the West Bengal government contested the Calcutta High Court's ruling in the Supreme Court, a two-judge bench of the apex court dismissed the plea on February 11 and instructed the NIA to submit a status report—whether post-investigation or during the probe—before the Calcutta High Court in a sealed envelope, to determine if a prima facie case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) was established based on the collected evidence.