Is Bengal BDO Prashant Barman Challenging the Calcutta HC's Bail Cancellation?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a dramatic turn of events, Rajganj BDO Prashant Barman is challenging the Calcutta High Court's decision to cancel his anticipatory bail in a high-profile murder case. As the case unfolds, we delve into the implications of this legal battle and its potential impact on the investigation.
Key Takeaways
- Prashant Barman is contesting a critical legal decision in the Supreme Court.
- The Calcutta High Court has raised concerns about the lower court's bail ruling.
- The investigation into the murder case continues to unfold.
- The implications of this case could affect public trust in local governance.
- Evidence against Barman suggests possible involvement in serious criminal activity.
Kolkata, Dec 25 (NationPress) The Rajganj Block Development Officer (BDO), Prashant Barman, has approached the Supreme Court to contest the Calcutta High Court's ruling that revoked his anticipatory bail regarding the murder case of a gold trader in the Duttabad locality of Salt Lake.
On Monday, the Calcutta High Court dismissed his anticipatory bail request, which had previously been granted by a subordinate court, and mandated his surrender within 72 hours.
Sources indicate that Barman filed his challenge in the Supreme Court the following day.
The Supreme Court is presently on its Christmas recess, resuming operations on January 5; however, a vacation bench will be accessible during this time.
Today marks the expiration of the High Court's deadline for Prashant Barman to surrender. This appeal to the Supreme Court is anticipated to add a new dimension to the case surrounding the abduction and murder of the gold trader in Duttabad.
The family of the victim, Swapan Kamilya, lodged a complaint against Barman.
During the investigation, authorities gathered various pieces of evidence that suggested Barman’s involvement. Several associates of the BDO were apprehended.
Despite this, law enforcement encountered significant challenges in detaining the Rajganj BDO. In the previous month, Prashant Barman sought anticipatory bail in the Barasat court, firmly denying all allegations.
The subordinate court approved his application, and he subsequently appeared before the Bidhannagar Sub-divisional court to finalize his bail.
Subsequently, Bidhannagar Police appealed to the Calcutta High Court, contesting the subordinate court's decision and seeking to annul the anticipatory bail granted to the accused BDO.
During the proceedings, the Calcutta High Court heavily criticized the ruling of the lower court, emphasizing that it had neglected to assess critical factors necessary when granting bail or anticipatory bail in a murder case. The High Court deemed that the lower court had issued bail while overlooking serious and vital evidence.
Point of View
The case involving Prashant Barman raises significant concerns regarding the judicial process and the implications of political influence in legal matters. The ongoing developments highlight the importance of maintaining integrity within the legal system to ensure justice is served without bias.
NationPress
25/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the background of the Prashant Barman case?
Prashant Barman, the BDO from Rajganj, is implicated in the murder of gold trader Swapan Kamilya, leading to a series of legal proceedings including a challenge to his bail status.
What did the Calcutta High Court rule regarding Barman's bail?
The Calcutta High Court revoked Barman's anticipatory bail, ordering him to surrender within 72 hours due to serious allegations against him.
What are the next steps in Barman's legal battle?
Barman has filed an appeal in the Supreme Court challenging the High Court's decision, which will be reviewed when the Supreme Court resumes from its recess.
What evidence has been presented against Barman?
Investigators have collected multiple pieces of evidence suggesting Barman's involvement in the murder, leading to the arrest of several individuals connected to him.
How has the public reacted to this case?
The case has garnered significant public attention due to its high-profile nature and the serious allegations involved, raising questions about governance and accountability.
