Is Bengal’s DA Crisis Justified with Differential Rates for State Employees?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- West Bengal government employees face unequal dearness allowance rates.
- The Supreme Court is currently reviewing the legality of this disparity.
- Employees in other states receive DA equivalent to central government rates.
- Local employees receive only 18% DA, significantly lower than their counterparts.
- Legal experts indicate potential challenges for the state government.
Kolkata, Aug 7 (NationPress) As the Supreme Court deliberates on whether employees of the West Bengal government should be entitled to the same dearness allowance (DA) as their peers in the central government, a new controversy has arisen concerning the existence of two distinct DA rates for state government employees.
The first group consists of West Bengal government employees who are assigned to work in other states on behalf of the state government. This group receives dearness allowance equivalent to that of their central government counterparts.
In contrast, the second group includes West Bengal government employees who serve within their home state, and they do not receive a dearness allowance that matches the rates offered by the central government or numerous other state governments.
At present, West Bengal government employees stationed in the state receive a dearness allowance of just 18 percent, compared to the 55 percent granted to their counterparts in the Union government and several other state governments.
This issue has already been highlighted to the Supreme Court by Bikas Ranjan Bhattacharya, a senior advocate and CPI(M) Rajya Sabha member representing the state government employees.
Legal experts believe that the existence of these differing dearness allowance rates for two categories of state government employees is quite unusual and could present a significant legal challenge for the state government.
Senior advocate Kaushik Gupta noted that since dearness allowance is a component of the salary structure, it is generally inadvisable to implement differential rates for different categories of permanent employees, especially when they are part of the same governmental framework.
“I have heard that the legal representatives for the state government employees have brought this matter to the Supreme Court's attention, and the court has acknowledged it,” he added.