Is the Bengal Government Considering a Supreme Court Challenge on the WBSSC Job Case?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- West Bengal government is contemplating a Supreme Court appeal.
- Identified “tainted” candidates are excluded from the WBSSC selection.
- The Calcutta High Court upheld the exclusion ruling.
- Internal party divisions complicate the government’s decision.
- The ruling impacts over 25,000 job appointments.
Kolkata, July 11 (NationPress) The West Bengal government appears to be conflicted regarding whether to appeal to the Supreme Court against a ruling by a division bench of the Calcutta High Court, which upheld a previous directive from a single-judge bench mandating the exclusion of identified “tainted” candidates from the ongoing selection process conducted by the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC).
This selection process aims to fill teaching positions in the state that are currently vacant due to a Supreme Court ruling in April, which annulled 25,753 school job appointments.
A member of the cabinet, speaking on the condition of anonymity, indicated that while legal experts are being consulted regarding the feasibility of an appeal to the Supreme Court, there is a division within the party leadership on this matter.
One faction advocates for a Supreme Court challenge to convey to all affected job seekers that the government is fully committed to safeguarding employment opportunities.
Conversely, others argue that the observations made by both the single-judge and division benches of the Calcutta High Court regarding the exclusion of “tainted” candidates lack sufficient merit to warrant a Supreme Court appeal.
Both benches noted that the Supreme Court had also mandated the exclusion of identified “tainted” candidates from the selection process in its April ruling.
Last Monday, the Calcutta High Court’s single-judge bench, presided over by Justice Saugata Bhattacharya, ruled that candidates labeled as “tainted” must be excluded from the selection process. Additionally, any application submitted for the fresh recruitment process by such candidates should be outright rejected.
The state government and the WBSSC challenged this directive in the division bench led by Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Smita Das.
On Thursday, the division bench upheld the single-judge bench’s ruling, dismissing the government’s argument that preventing identified “tainted” candidates from participating constitutes a form of double jeopardy.