Did a Bengaluru Court Really Grant Bail to a Man Accused of Rape?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
A Bengaluru court's recent decision to grant bail to a 64-year-old man accused of raping his former lover has sparked significant interest. This case highlights complex issues surrounding consent, relationships, and societal pressures. The court's ruling raises questions about the nature of justice in sensitive cases like these.
Key Takeaways
- Bengaluru court grants bail to a senior citizen accused of rape.
- The relationship was deemed consensual by the court.
- Complaints were lodged after the woman's husband discovered the affair.
- Evidence included extensive call records demonstrating a personal relationship.
- The case highlights societal pressures surrounding allegations of sexual misconduct.
Bengaluru, Nov 20 (NationPress) On Thursday, the court in Bengaluru granted anticipatory bail to a 64-year-old man who faced allegations of rape from his former lover, also a senior citizen.
The decision was made by Special Judge Anitha. G of the 53rd Bengaluru Additional City and Civil Sessions Court.
The complaint was registered at the Bellandur police station under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The accused sought protection from arrest.
During court proceedings, it was revealed that the relationship between the two was entirely consensual and had lasted for an extensive period. The complaint was reportedly filed only after the woman's husband became aware of their relationship.
The court acknowledged claims that the complainant's husband attempted to influence the situation due to his connections with high-profile individuals, including a former Vice-President, and that senior police officials had repeatedly contacted the accused to resolve the matter.
The case was argued over two sessions by Advocate Prateek Som from Delhi, leading the court to ultimately approve the anticipatory bail request.
The complainant stated that she was acquainted with the accused, who often visited her during her naturopathy treatment in Haridwar.
She alleged that he took her to a room under the pretense of worship, locked the door, and assaulted her.
According to her statement, he attempted to undress her and threatened her to remain silent.
Due to health issues, she fainted, and the accused fled the scene.
He later returned, warned her against disclosing the incident, and drove her to the airport.
Upon her return to Bengaluru, she filed a police report.
The accused contended that the FIR was fabricated out of malice.
He claimed the complainant had concealed the fact that they had been involved in a consensual extramarital relationship since 2019.
The accused submitted nearly 120 call records spanning 7.30 hours, indicating they shared personal, intimate, and sexual conversations.
He asserted that their phone interactions reflected a profound emotional connection, characterized by mutual declarations of love, including an exchange on August 19, 2025, just hours before the alleged assault.
The accused argued that the husband discovered their affair and pressured the complainant to file the complaint to protect her social standing.
In granting bail, the court noted that the victim had actively engaged in their conversations.
It appeared that the complainant may have lodged the complaint due to her husband's discovery of their relationship, aiming to preserve her marriage.
The court also mentioned that the accused had voluntarily appeared for questioning on November 3, 2025, but the investigation officer chose not to interrogate him.
Taking all factors into account, the court decided to grant bail to the senior citizen.
Point of View
This case underscores the complexities of consent and the societal factors influencing legal outcomes. While the court's ruling reflects the evidence presented, it also highlights the need for a thorough examination of relationships and motivations behind complaints in such sensitive matters. As always, NationPress advocates for justice and fairness in all cases.
NationPress
20/11/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What were the charges against the accused?
The accused faced charges of rape as per the complaint lodged by his former lover, highlighting serious allegations against him.
What factors influenced the court's decision?
The court considered the consensual nature of the relationship and the timing of the complaint, which was filed after the woman's husband discovered their affair.
Who represented the accused in court?
Advocate Prateek Som from Delhi represented the accused during the court proceedings.
What evidence did the accused present?
The accused provided nearly 120 call records showing extensive communication with the complainant, indicating a consensual relationship.
What was the court's stance on the victim's participation?
The court noted that the victim had actively participated in conversations with the accused, which influenced their decision to grant bail.
