Did BJP Respond to Chidambaram's ‘Homegrown Terrorists’ Claim on Pahalgam Attack?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The political arena is charged as Congress leader P Chidambaram suggests the terrorists in the Pahalgam attack might be homegrown, igniting a fierce backlash from the BJP. This article delves into the heated exchanges and implications for national security.
Key Takeaways
- Political backlash over Chidambaram's remarks on terrorism.
- BJP leaders accuse Congress of undermining national security.
- Historical context of terrorist attacks in India.
- Importance of evidence in attributing blame for terrorism.
- Upcoming Parliament debate on security operations.
New Delhi, July 28 (NationPress) The recent statement by senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, implying that the terrorists responsible for the Pahalgam attack may have been "homegrown" rather than originating from Pakistan, has ignited a fierce political outcry. BJP leaders have accused the Congress party of protecting terror sponsors and undermining national security.
Union Minister Anurag Thakur expressed his outrage, asserting, “It is clearly visible that whenever India faced a terrorist attack, Congress never spoke against Pakistan. Take the 26/11 attack, for example, Congress did nothing and failed to give a strong response.”
BJP MP CP Joshi challenged the Congress party's historical actions, asking, “Before 2014, the country witnessed several terrorist attacks. Did you ever try to eliminate those terrorists or the masterminds behind the camps?”
Chidambaram criticized the government’s quick attribution of the attack to Pakistan, questioning, “What if they were homegrown terrorists? Why have you assumed they came from Pakistan? Where is the evidence? Has the NIA identified them? Where did they come from? Has the NIA revealed anything? Perhaps the terrorists were created here. The government is also hiding the extent of damage India suffered.”
BJP MP Arun Govil, known for his portrayal of Lord Ram, responded, “There can be no bigger lie in this world than what Chidambaram has said.”
Former Maharashtra Minister and BJP leader Raj Purohit took it further, stating, “If they weren’t Pakistanis, maybe they were Congressmen. Chidambaram has been the Home and Finance Minister, he knows things common people don’t.”
Even some from the Opposition distanced themselves from Chidambaram's remarks. NCP (SP faction) leader Amar Sharadrao Kale stated, “I haven't heard the full statement, but the entire world knows who is behind these attacks. Pakistan’s role is clear. We must respond in their own language.”
Chidambaram’s comments arrive ahead of a significant Parliament debate regarding Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam attack.
Point of View
It is crucial to analyze the implications of Chidambaram's statement on India's security narrative. While political discourse is essential, it should not overshadow the pressing need for a united front against terrorism, regardless of its origins. The focus should remain on safeguarding national integrity and responding decisively to threats.
NationPress
20/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Chidambaram say about the Pahalgam attack?
Chidambaram suggested that the terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack might be homegrown rather than from Pakistan, questioning the government's quick attribution to foreign elements.
How did BJP leaders respond?
BJP leaders accused Chidambaram and the Congress party of shielding terror sponsors and disrespecting national security, with Union Minister Anurag Thakur highlighting Congress's historical silence on terrorism.
What is the significance of Operation Sindoor?
Operation Sindoor is expected to be a key topic in Parliament, focusing on the Pahalgam attack and India's response to terrorism.
