BJP accuses Congress of SIR U-turns, demands apology over ECI attacks

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
BJP accuses Congress of SIR U-turns, demands apology over ECI attacks

Synopsis

The BJP has turned the tables on Congress over the Special Intensive Revision of voter lists, presenting a decade-long paper trail of Congress statements that, it argues, directly contradict the party's current criticism of the ECI. The demand for a public apology signals this dispute will intensify ahead of upcoming state polls.

Key Takeaways

BJP National Media Co-convenor Sidharth Yadav accused Congress of making repeated 'U-turns' on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls at a press conference in New Delhi on Tuesday .
Rahul Gandhi was specifically accused of first blaming Mamata Banerjee for BJP's entry into West Bengal , then attributing the result to the ECI after elections.
In 2018 , Congress demanded removal of 42 lakh duplicate names from the Rajasthan voter list; the SIR subsequently deleted approximately 41.85 lakh names.
BJP cited voter deletions in Delhi ( 13.58 lakh , 2013), Bihar ( 76 lakh flagged, 2013), and Maharashtra ( 70.76 lakh removed, 2014) — all without opposition protest at the time.
BJP claims SIRs were conducted ten times under Congress governments without objection, and demanded Congress apologise for 'eroding public trust' in democratic institutions.

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Tuesday launched a sharp offensive against the Indian National Congress, accusing the opposition party of repeated policy reversals — or 'U-turns' — on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, and demanding a formal apology for what the ruling party called a sustained campaign to undermine India's democratic institutions.

Key Accusations at the Press Conference

At a press conference in New Delhi, BJP National Media Co-convenor Sidharth Yadav trained his fire on Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi, alleging that Gandhi's positions on electoral integrity have shifted based on political convenience. Yadav recalled that ahead of the West Bengal Assembly elections, Gandhi had blamed then Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee for enabling the BJP's entry into the state — only to, after the elections, attribute the BJP's performance to the Election Commission of India (ECI) and the electoral process itself.

'We are witnessing a persistent campaign of false propaganda and narratives — particularly by Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi — about the country's electoral process. The attempt to erode citizens' faith in the democratic process and weaken the backbone of democracy is evident to all,' Yadav said.

Historical Examples Cited by BJP

Yadav cited a series of historical instances to argue that Congress had previously supported voter-list purification exercises before turning against them. He noted that on 15 August 2018, the Congress alleged that 42 lakh duplicate names existed in the Rajasthan voter list and demanded their removal. The subsequent SIR process, he said, resulted in the deletion of approximately 41.85 lakh names — broadly matching Congress's own demand at the time.

He further pointed out that when the SIR was conducted in Kerala and Congress emerged victorious, party leaders praised the exercise as 'helpful and an excellent initiative,' even claiming that the Communist Party had inserted bogus names into the voter list. 'In 2018, the Congress maintained that failing to remove duplicate names amounted to a betrayal of democracy. Now, we are witnessing the Congress's reaction as names are being removed,' Yadav said.

Data Points on Past Voter-List Revisions

The BJP leader cited additional data points to reinforce his argument. He noted that on 24 August 2013, 13.58 lakh votes were deleted in Delhi, adding that the BJP — then in opposition — did not challenge the process. In Bihar, on 9 August 2013, 76 lakh voters were flagged as suspicious without any opposition objection. In Maharashtra, on 27 April 2014, 70.76 lakh voters were removed and 74 lakh voters were added without an SIR, again without allegations of vote theft. Yadav also claimed that SIRs were conducted ten times during the tenures of Congress governments, and that 'at that time, no one questioned the process.'

BJP's Demand for an Apology

Yadav concluded with a direct call for accountability, arguing that casting doubt on constitutional institutions to mask electoral failures was 'not the opposition's role' but 'an injustice to the country.' He also referenced videos that have reportedly surfaced showing illegal immigrants admitting to having voted in elections prior to the SIR process, though these claims could not be independently verified. 'The Congress party should apologise for this,' he asserted.

The BJP's broadside comes amid an ongoing national debate over the ECI's SIR exercise, with the opposition arguing the process risks disenfranchising legitimate voters. How both sides navigate this dispute is likely to shape the political narrative heading into upcoming state elections.

Point of View

The party seeks to reframe the SIR debate from a civil-liberties question into a hypocrisy narrative. What mainstream coverage risks missing is the substantive concern beneath the politics: whether the current SIR's scale and pace create conditions for legitimate voter deletions, regardless of which party benefits. The BJP's data points are largely verifiable, but the framing sidesteps that question entirely. As state elections approach, this dispute is less about electoral rolls and more about who controls the legitimacy narrative around the ECI.
NationPress
29 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls?
The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) is a process conducted by the Election Commission of India to audit and clean up voter lists by identifying and removing duplicate, bogus, or ineligible entries. It has been used periodically across multiple states and has now become the centre of a political dispute between the BJP and Congress.
Why is the BJP accusing Congress of making U-turns on the SIR?
The BJP argues that Congress previously demanded voter-list purges — including the removal of 42 lakh names in Rajasthan in 2018 — but is now criticising the ECI for conducting similar exercises. The party presented multiple historical instances where Congress either praised or stayed silent on comparable deletions, calling this a contradiction.
What did BJP's Sidharth Yadav say about Rahul Gandhi and the ECI?
BJP National Media Co-convenor Sidharth Yadav alleged that Rahul Gandhi blamed Mamata Banerjee for BJP's presence in West Bengal before the state elections, but after the results attributed the BJP's performance to the ECI and the electoral process — which Yadav characterised as a politically motivated U-turn.
What historical voter deletions did the BJP cite?
The BJP cited deletions of 13.58 lakh votes in Delhi on 24 August 2013, flagging of 76 lakh suspicious voters in Bihar on 9 August 2013, and the removal of 70.76 lakh voters alongside the addition of 74 lakh voters in Maharashtra on 27 April 2014 — all without opposition objection at the time.
What is the BJP demanding from Congress?
The BJP is demanding a formal public apology from the Congress party for what it describes as a systematic campaign to erode public trust in the Election Commission of India and India's democratic institutions. BJP's Yadav called this behaviour 'an injustice to the country.'
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. Yesterday
  3. 2 days ago
  4. 2 days ago
  5. 10 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google