BJP's Prakash Pal slams Akhilesh Yadav: 'Riots, fear your only legacy'

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
BJP's Prakash Pal slams Akhilesh Yadav: 'Riots, fear your only legacy'

Synopsis

BJP MP Prakash Pal fired back at Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav on Tuesday after SP put up posters claiming credit for women-centric schemes, alleging the party's real legacy was riots, fear, and suppression of backward classes — and demanding SP explain why it won only 47 seats if its governance was truly transformative.

Key Takeaways

BJP MP Prakash Pal on 13 October in Lucknow attacked SP chief Akhilesh Yadav over posters claiming credit for women-centric schemes.
The controversy was triggered by an SP poster featuring Goddess Durga displayed outside the party's headquarters.
Pal alleged the previous SP government created an atmosphere of fear, instigated riots, and denied rights to backward classes and Dalits.
The BJP MP questioned why SP won only 47 seats in its tenure if its development record was strong.
Pal also accused the INDI Alliance of undermining constitutional institutions, citing a Monday protest march he described as the first ever directed against the Supreme Court .

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Prakash Pal on Tuesday, 13 October launched a sharp attack on Samajwadi Party (SP) chief Akhilesh Yadav in Lucknow, alleging that the SP was attempting to claim credit for women-centric welfare schemes while conveniently glossing over its own record on law and order during its previous tenure in Uttar Pradesh. The remarks came in response to a poster displayed outside the SP headquarters featuring an image of Goddess Durga and highlighting welfare initiatives from the party's state government years.

The Poster That Triggered the Row

The controversy was set off when the Samajwadi Party put up a poster outside its party office in Lucknow, invoking the image of Goddess Durga and drawing attention to various women-centric schemes the party claims to have introduced during its time in power in Uttar Pradesh. The BJP was quick to push back, calling the display an attempt to rewrite history.

What BJP's Prakash Pal Said

Speaking to reporters, Pal offered a pointed counter-narrative. 'Akhilesh Yadav can take credit for how he usurped the rights of the backward classes, Dalits and the general category. He could put up posters claiming, 'I did it before, and I will do it again.' He could display posters admitting how riots occurred during his (past SP government's) tenure, saying, 'I used to instigate a riot every third day.' He could say that during his time, traders were forced to shut their shops by 5 or 6 p.m.,'

Pal also alleged that the law-and-order situation under the previous SP government created a climate of fear, particularly affecting women. 'He (Akhilesh Yadav) can take credit for creating such an atmosphere of fear that girls were afraid to step out. They (SP government) took over people's land; they can take credit for those things,' he said.

Questioning SP's Electoral Track Record

The BJP MP questioned the credibility of the SP's development claims by pointing to its electoral performance. 'If they have done so much good work, why did they win only 47 seats when they were in power?' Pal asked, also flagging the party's limited parliamentary wins in 2014 and 2019, which he argued were largely confined to constituencies linked to the SP's political family. He attributed the SP's successive electoral reverses to anti-incumbency generated by its own governance record, and praised the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath.

Attack on the Opposition's Constitutional Stance

Pal broadened his attack to take aim at the wider opposition bloc, accusing it of undermining India's constitutional institutions. He referred specifically to a protest march held on Monday that he described as directed against the Supreme Court — which he called an unprecedented act. 'The Opposition wants to malign all of India's constitutional institutions, be it the Election Commission or, as seen yesterday, in what was perhaps the first instance of a march being held against the Supreme Court. As part of an international conspiracy, they discredit India's constitutional bodies, make a mockery of democracy, question the Election Commission, and speak against the Judiciary. Thus, the 'INDI Alliance' has turned anti-India in its opposition to PM Modi,' he said.

The Bigger Political Picture

The exchange is the latest flashpoint in the ongoing BJP-SP rivalry ahead of future electoral cycles in Uttar Pradesh, India's most populous state. Both parties have been engaged in a sustained battle over the narrative around governance, welfare delivery, and law and order — each seeking to frame the other's record unfavourably. Notably, the SP's use of religious imagery alongside welfare messaging signals a deliberate attempt to expand its appeal beyond its traditional base, a move the BJP appears keen to contest aggressively.

Point of View

But its effectiveness depends on whether voters' lived memory of the SP era still stings. The broader attack on the 'INDI Alliance' as 'anti-India' for protesting against the Supreme Court is a significant escalation in framing — one that seeks to conflate institutional criticism with disloyalty. Mainstream coverage tends to treat these exchanges as routine political mud-slinging; the more meaningful signal is the SP's deliberate pivot to religious imagery combined with welfare messaging, a strategic shift the BJP clearly does not intend to let pass uncontested.
NationPress
13 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did BJP's Prakash Pal attack Akhilesh Yadav on 13 October 2026?
BJP MP Prakash Pal attacked SP chief Akhilesh Yadav after the Samajwadi Party displayed a poster outside its Lucknow headquarters — featuring an image of Goddess Durga — claiming credit for women-centric schemes from its previous government. Pal alleged the SP was attempting to rewrite its record and should instead own up to riots and poor law and order during its tenure.
What did the SP poster outside its Lucknow office show?
The poster featured an image of Goddess Durga and highlighted various women-centric schemes the Samajwadi Party claims to have introduced during its tenure as the ruling party in Uttar Pradesh. The BJP criticised the move as an attempt to take undue credit while ignoring a damaging governance record.
What specific allegations did BJP make about the SP government's tenure?
BJP MP Prakash Pal alleged that during the SP's time in power, riots occurred frequently, traders were forced to shut shops as early as 5 or 6 pm, women and girls were afraid to step out, and the rights of backward classes, Dalits, and the general category were suppressed. He also alleged that land was taken from people.
What was BJP's criticism of the INDI Alliance and the Supreme Court march?
Pal accused the opposition INDI Alliance of working to undermine India's constitutional institutions, including the Election Commission and the Supreme Court, calling Monday's protest march against the Supreme Court potentially the first such instance in India. He alleged this was part of an international conspiracy to discredit India's democratic institutions.
How did BJP challenge SP's development claims using electoral data?
BJP MP Prakash Pal questioned the SP's claims of significant development work by pointing out the party won only 47 seats during its own tenure in power. He also referenced the party's limited parliamentary performance in 2014 and 2019, arguing that genuine good governance would have translated into stronger electoral mandates.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 weeks ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 3 months ago
  7. 3 months ago
  8. 4 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google