Have Players Forgotten That Pak Terrorists Killed Our Countrymen?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a heartfelt plea, Aishanya Dwivedi, widow of Shubham Dwivedi, urges a boycott of the upcoming India-Pakistan cricket match in the Asia Cup. This call resonates deeply, reflecting the pain of families impacted by terrorism. As tensions rise, will the cricketing community heed her request?
Key Takeaways
- Aishanya Dwivedi calls for a boycott of the upcoming cricket match.
- The Pahalgam attack has left deep scars on families.
- Public sentiment is overwhelmingly in support of her plea.
- The controversy highlights the tension between India and Pakistan.
- The BCCI faces criticism for proceeding with the match.
New Delhi, Sep 14 (NationPress) Aishanya Dwivedi, the spouse of Pahalgam terror attack victim Shubham Dwivedi, has issued a passionate plea to boycott the upcoming cricket match between India and Pakistan in the Asia Cup, scheduled for this Sunday. She urged cricket enthusiasts and citizens to refrain from watching the match, even on television.
Left heartbroken after her husband was brutally murdered by terrorists in Pahalgam on April 22 this year, just two months post their marriage, Aishanya Dwivedi expressed her anguish.
Speaking to IANS, she emphasized, “This is not just our protest. It represents the 26 families who lost their beloved ones in the Pahalgam attack. This is a voice for every family who has seen their sons and brothers slaughtered in this incident.”
It is significant that India and Pakistan are set to face off for the first time since the tragic events of April 22. The match has ignited considerable controversy and provoked strong opposition, given the tense relations between the two nations following the horrific terror attack.
While the government has adopted a stringent position against any bilateral relations with Pakistan, it has allowed the multi-nation tournament, attributing its decision to certain ‘compulsions’.
Aishanya further stated, "I am actively voicing my concerns on social media. So far, no one has approached me to say I am wrong. Everyone stands with me, and many are also boycotting this match."
Criticizing the cricketing organization, she noted that if a regular citizen can grasp the public sentiment, she finds it perplexing why the BCCI and the players are eager to engage in a match against Pakistan.
“They seem to have forgotten that the terrorists from Pakistan have taken the lives of their own countrymen. They disregard the sacrifices of our soldiers who bravely fought against Pakistan,” she remarked.
She added, “No one has forced these players to participate. They have chosen to do so voluntarily; they should have taken a stand. It appears that the Indian players and the BCCI do not perceive terrorism as a national concern. Kuldeep Yadav, also from Kanpur, has agreed to play; he could have declined.”
Shubham's father, Sanjay Dwivedi, also expressed discontent with the BCCI and the players’ actions.
He stated, “Since I learned about the match between India and Pakistan, I have been voicing my opposition. Our country’s players are competing with a nation that has killed innocent citizens. It is truly disheartening.”
“This match should be boycotted. The BCCI shows no regard for the citizens of the country. The board must sever ties with an enemy nation,” he added.
Point of View
It is essential to acknowledge the sentiments expressed by Aishanya Dwivedi and the families affected by terrorism. While sports can unite, it is crucial to consider the emotional landscape surrounding such events, especially when they intersect with national sentiments and security concerns. The call for a boycott reflects a broader issue of national integrity and remembrance of those lost.
NationPress
14/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Aishanya Dwivedi's plea?
Aishanya Dwivedi is urging everyone to boycott the upcoming cricket match between India and Pakistan due to the tragic loss of her husband and other victims of the Pahalgam attack.
Why is the cricket match controversial?
The match is controversial because it occurs shortly after a brutal terror attack, raising questions about the appropriateness of sporting engagements between the two nations.
What has been the public response?
There has been significant public support for Aishanya’s plea, with many citizens agreeing to boycott the match.
How has the BCCI responded to the situation?
The BCCI has maintained its decision to allow the match to proceed, citing certain 'compulsions' despite public opposition.
What broader issues does this incident highlight?
This incident highlights issues of national sentiment, the impact of terrorism, and the responsibilities of public figures in sensitive political climates.
