Bihar: BPSC Critiques Khan Sir Over Question Paper Issues
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The BPSC has criticized Khan Sir, a prominent Patna educator, for demanding the cancellation of the 70th BPSC Prelims exam. Accusations of vulgarity and misinformation have been leveled against him, while the commission defends the exam's integrity amid rising protests from candidates.
Key Takeaways
- BPSC has condemned Khan Sir's actions.
- Claims of exam irregularities are under scrutiny.
- Khan Sir demands a re-examination.
- Transparency in the examination process is a major concern.
- The controversy is escalating among candidates and educators.
Patna, Feb 19 (NationPress) The Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) has issued a pointed critique against Faishal Khan, widely recognized as Khan Sir, a prominent coaching educator based in Patna, who has been advocating for the annulment of the 70th BPSC Prelims exam.
BPSC posted a video of Khan Sir on its official X account, accusing him of exceeding all boundaries of “vulgarity, rudeness, and indecency”.
The commission cautioned students to remain vigilant against such educators. BPSC labeled him a “self-proclaimed coaching operator” who is deceiving students and charged him with damaging the reputation of a constitutional body.
Furthermore, it asserted that his comments aim to demoralize the dedicated personnel of the commission. Khan Sir has been spearheading demonstrations against purported irregularities in the 70th BPSC Prelims exam.
He has called for an inquiry into the treasury operations of Gaya and Nawada districts, alleging mismanagement of the question papers.
BPSC has refuted all accusations, affirming that the examination was carried out with full transparency. The commission insists that the exam was conducted justly and that coaching institutions are misleading students.
The commission is poised to pursue further legal or administrative measures against those disseminating alleged falsehoods.
The controversy surrounding the BPSC 70th Prelims Exam is intensifying, with protesting candidates and educator Khan Sir claiming significant irregularities in the examination process.
Their main demand is a re-examination, citing issues regarding fairness and transparency.
Khan Sir alleged that the exam papers were not secured in the treasuries of Gaya and Nawada, raising concerns about potential tampering.
He asserted that the set of question papers, which was not secured in the treasuries of Gaya and Nawada, was utilized in the January 4 re-examination, which took place at 22 locations.
This resulted in the January 4 re-exam achieving a pass percentage of 19 percent, markedly higher than the 6 percent pass rate from the original December 13 exam.
