What Did the Calcutta HC Direct the Centre to Do Regarding MGNREGA Funds for West Bengal?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Calcutta High Court directs Centre to file affidavit.
- Affidavit should outline plans for MGNREGA fund release.
- Union Government accused of withholding funds for West Bengal.
- Political tensions between Trinamool Congress and BJP continue.
- Previous court rulings emphasized the need for transparency.
Kolkata, Nov 7 (NationPress) A Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court has mandated the Centre to submit an affidavit that outlines the strategy for releasing the long-awaited funds to the West Bengal government for the 100-day employment initiative under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).
The acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul and Justice Smita Das De instructed the Union government to prepare the affidavit within four weeks.
According to the Bench's directives, the petitioners, who allege that the Union government is intentionally withholding MGNREGA funds from West Bengal, will be required to present their arguments regarding the Centre's affidavit two weeks post-filing. Following this, the next court session will take place.
To recall, the Union Government halted payments under the MGNREGA program three years ago, which sparked a fierce political clash between the Trinamool Congress and the BJP.
The Union government contends that the payment freeze was due to significant corruption in the scheme's execution. Earlier in June, the Calcutta High Court instructed the Union government to resume payments for the outstanding MGNREGA funds for West Bengal, following a petition by the Paschim Banga Khet Mojur Samiti, representing agricultural workers in the state.
The Calcutta High Court noted that while the Union Government could impose conditions on MGNREGA funds disbursement, it could not completely cease payments based on these conditions.
In July, the Union Government contested the Calcutta High Court ruling in the Supreme Court. Last month, the Supreme Court's Division Bench, consisting of Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta, upheld the Calcutta High Court's decision and refused to intervene.