What Report is the Calcutta HC Requesting from the ECI Regarding Polling Booths in Bengal?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Kolkata, Jan 30 (NationPress) - The Calcutta High Court has requested a report from the Election Commission of India (ECI) concerning the state of infrastructure in polling booths throughout West Bengal, especially in light of the forthcoming critical Assembly elections.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice Sujoy Paul and Justice Partha Sarathi Sen initiated this request following a public interest litigation that raised concerns about the inadequate infrastructure at various polling stations in the state.
This litigation was submitted by Samik Bhattacharya, the state President of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and a member of the Rajya Sabha.
During the hearing, the bench indicated that a comprehensive order could not be issued without hearing arguments from the ECI, leading to the request for a report from the commission.
The court noted that the primary duty of assessing the infrastructure condition of polling booths rests with the ECI, which is responsible for directing the state government accordingly.
Consequently, the court is awaiting a report from the Commission regarding the measures they have implemented to ensure the upkeep of polling booth infrastructures in the state.
This matter is scheduled for another hearing next week.
The Election Commission has established clear guidelines regarding the minimum infrastructure requirements that must be met in polling booths across all states and Union Territories. However, voters in West Bengal have long reported that these basic facilities are often neglected, particularly in remote rural areas.
In preparation for the upcoming elections, the state Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) proposed that the public sector unit, Mackintosh Burn Limited (MBL), serve as the implementation agency for maintaining these essential infrastructure facilities, known as assured minimum facilities (AMF) and extended minimum facilities (EMF), at polling stations.
Initially, MBL management consented to this arrangement, but subsequently informed the CEO's office of their inability to undertake the task.