Calcutta HC slams ECI for stripping AISF's 'envelope' symbol, giving it to Ritabrata faction
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
A single-judge bench of the Calcutta High Court on Thursday, 24 September 2026, sharply criticised the Election Commission of India (ECI) for withdrawing the 'envelope' symbol from the All India Secular Front (AISF) and allotting it to the Ritabrata Banerjee-led faction of Trinamool Congress — just weeks before the upcoming bypolls for Nandigram and Rejinagar Assembly constituencies in West Bengal. The court's intervention comes as AISF's lone West Bengal Assembly representative, Nawsad Siddique, prepares to contest the Nandigram bypoll scheduled for 6 October.
Background: What the Symbol Dispute Is About
The AISF, led by Nawsad Siddique, has contested West Bengal elections under the 'envelope' symbol for years. Siddique was elected from the Bhangar Assembly constituency in South 24 Parganas district twice using this symbol — first in 2021 and again in 2026. Earlier this month, the ECI withdrew the symbol from AISF and allotted it to the Ritabrata Banerjee-led Trinamool Congress faction, which has also been given the new party name 'Democratic Trinamool Congress'. For the Nandigram bypoll, AISF will now be required to contest under the 'almirah' symbol.
What the Court Said
Justice Krishna Rao, presiding over the single-judge bench, questioned why the ECI had specifically chosen the 'envelope' symbol for the Ritabrata-led faction when 183 other free symbols were available. He criticised the Commission's decision as lacking fairness and said that mid-election symbol changes create unnecessary voter confusion and place an avoidable burden on the judiciary.
Justice Rao further observed that the ECI should have kept the 'envelope' symbol reserved rather than allotting it to another active political leader contesting in the same election cycle. His remarks signal judicial unease with the Commission's process, even if no final order has yet been passed.
ECI's Defence
The ECI's counsel countered that unrecognised political parties such as AISF do not hold a permanent or reserved right to any specific symbol. The argument draws on established electoral law — symbols for unrecognised parties are drawn from a common pool of free symbols and are not guaranteed between elections. The Commission's position is that it acted within its legal authority in reallocating the symbol.
Stakes for the Bypolls
The Nandigram bypoll is being watched closely given its political history — the constituency rose to national prominence during the 2021 West Bengal Assembly elections when Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee contested and lost to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)'s Suvendu Adhikari. AISF's Siddique, who holds the party's only legislative seat in West Bengal, now faces the additional challenge of voter recognition under a new symbol with weeks to go before polling. A last-minute symbol change for a party with limited organisational bandwidth can materially affect electoral outcomes, critics argue. The Rejinagar bypoll in Murshidabad is also scheduled alongside Nandigram next month.
What Comes Next
The matter is expected to proceed further in the Calcutta High Court, with the ECI likely to file a detailed reply. Given the 6 October polling date, any judicial direction — or its absence — will need to come swiftly for it to have practical effect. The case raises broader questions about the ECI's symbol allocation process for unrecognised parties in multi-contest election windows, and whether procedural fairness norms need clearer codification.