Why Did CAT Direct Kerala Government to Grant Vigilance Clearance to Senior IPS Officer?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- CAT's ruling emphasizes bureaucratic fairness.
- Yogesh Gupta's expertise in policing and finance is significant.
- The interplay between politics and bureaucracy can impede careers.
- Political favor can impact career advancements for civil servants.
- The necessity of Vigilance clearance for top national positions.
Thiruvananthapuram, Sep 30 (NationPress) In a significant move, the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has mandated the Kerala government to furnish a necessary Vigilance clearance certificate to senior IPS officer Yogesh Gupta within a span of five working days, thereby resolving a prolonged delay that has hindered his career advancements.
This directive follows persistent reminders from the Union Home Ministry, which stipulates the clearance as a prerequisite for evaluating officers for assignments in prestigious national agencies.
Despite Gupta's submission of 13 applications and receiving four distinct orders from the CAT, the state government has not taken action, instead reallocating Gupta to various positions.
Whenever inquiries arose, officials sidestepped direct answers, leaving Gupta in a bureaucratic deadlock.
Currently serving as the Director General of Police, Gupta has found himself sidelined in Kerala’s political landscape after falling out of favor with Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan.
With a rare combination of policing and financial acumen, as an IPS officer and a certified cost and chartered accountant, Gupta previously garnered the trust of successive administrations.
He held multiple terms as the Managing Director of the Kerala State Beverages Corporation, the state's sole wholesaler of liquor and beer.
The pivotal moment arrived during his leadership of the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) when he submitted case files concerning K.M. Abraham, Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister, directly to the Kerala High Court.
The High Court directed a CBI investigation against Abraham regarding disproportionate assets, although the Supreme Court later stayed this probe. The repercussions were immediate.
Gupta was dismissed from the Vigilance position and reassigned to the Fire and Rescue Services, and subsequently shifted again, indicating a stark decline in his influence.
Since then, his Vigilance clearance has been obstructed, despite numerous follow-ups with Chief Secretary A. Jayathilak and even a formal complaint Gupta lodged with the Chief Minister’s Grievance Cell.
Ironically, Gupta has completed full tenures with both the CBI and ED.
The CAT’s ruling is perceived as a crucial test case reflecting how political dynamics can shape and sometimes impede bureaucratic careers in Kerala.