Did CAT Direct DSSSB to Accept Applications from 15 Assistant Teacher Aspirants Seeking Age Relaxation?

Click to start listening
Did CAT Direct DSSSB to Accept Applications from 15 Assistant Teacher Aspirants Seeking Age Relaxation?

Synopsis

In a significant ruling, the CAT has instructed the DSSSB to provisionally accept applications from 15 aspiring Assistant Teachers. This decision comes amidst challenges regarding age relaxation criteria, highlighting the ongoing struggle of candidates as the examination date looms closer.

Key Takeaways

  • CAT's directive to DSSSB to accept applications provisionally.
  • Age relaxation concerns addressed for aspiring teachers.
  • Importance of fairness and equity in educational recruitment.
  • Representation by experienced advocates highlights the legal complexities involved.
  • Future implications for candidates as the examination date approaches.

New Delhi, Nov 9 (NationPress) The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) has instructed the Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB) to provisionally accept the application forms of 15 candidates aspiring for the role of Assistant Teacher (Primary).

A Bench led by Judicial Member Manish Garg and Administrative Member Dr. Anand S. Khati issued the ruling while reviewing a petition filed by applicants from Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, and Punjab, who contested an advertisement for the Assistant Teacher position in the Directorate of Education.

The petitioners, represented by advocates Ashu Bidhuri, Swapnam Prakash Singh, and Shabana Hussain, argued that the DSSSB did not provide the three-year age relaxation they were entitled to, and requested the annulment of the advertisement while asking for their applications to be accepted within the permissible age limits.

They also sought immediate interim relief, emphasizing the need for their applications to be accepted as the examination is scheduled for March 2026. They noted that their repeated appeals to the authorities had gone unanswered.

Referencing a previous ruling that allowed candidates in comparable circumstances to submit their forms despite age-related objections, the CAT highlighted that fairness necessitated a similar resolution in this instance.

The DSSSB contested the application, arguing that the candidates approached the Tribunal after the deadline and that granting such relief could lead to significant complications.

However, the CAT dismissed this concern, stating that allowing provisional participation for the candidates would not disadvantage the authorities. It ordered the DSSSB to accept their application forms both online and offline.

"In light of the relief granted in O.A. No. 3884/2025 (Deepak & Ors. vs. DSSSB & Ors.), this Original Application is resolved at the admission stage in similar terms, particularly considering paragraphs 16 to 19 of the aforementioned order. The applicants' representations will be evaluated on an individual basis," the ruling stated.

Nonetheless, the CAT clarified that the candidates' applications would remain contingent upon meeting eligibility criteria and the final results of ongoing proceedings.

Point of View

I recognize the importance of equitable access to educational opportunities. The CAT's ruling reflects a commitment to fairness, ensuring that aspiring teachers are not unjustly excluded due to age criteria. This decision upholds the principles of justice while balancing the needs of the administrative bodies involved.
NationPress
10/11/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the significance of the CAT's ruling?
The CAT's ruling signifies a crucial step toward ensuring that candidates receive fair treatment regarding age limitations, allowing them to participate in the Assistant Teacher selection process.
Who are the advocates representing the aspirants?
The aspirants are represented by advocates Ashu Bidhuri, Swapnam Prakash Singh, and Shabana Hussain.
What was the DSSSB's argument against the plea?
The DSSSB contended that the candidates approached the Tribunal after the application deadline and expressed concerns about the potential complications of granting such relief.
What does the ruling mean for the candidates?
The ruling allows the candidates to provisionally submit their applications while still requiring compliance with eligibility criteria pending the outcome of ongoing proceedings.
When is the examination scheduled?
The examination for the Assistant Teacher position is scheduled for March 2026.
Nation Press