Has Sanatan Sanstha Served a Rs 10 Crore Defamation Notice to Prithviraj Chavan?

Click to start listening
Has Sanatan Sanstha Served a Rs 10 Crore Defamation Notice to Prithviraj Chavan?

Synopsis

Political tensions rise as Prithviraj Chavan faces a Rs 10 crore defamation notice from Sanatan Sanstha. His comments on ‘Sanatani terrorism’ have ignited backlash from various political factions. Will Chavan apologize or fight back?

Key Takeaways

  • Prithviraj Chavan is under legal scrutiny for his statements.
  • Sanatan Sanstha has issued a Rs 10 crore defamation notice.
  • Political backlash is evident from BJP and Shiv Sena.
  • Chavan has 15 days to respond to the notice.
  • The Malegaon verdict also plays a significant role in this context.

New Delhi, Aug 7 (NationPress) Former Chief Minister of Maharashtra, Prithviraj Chavan, has ignited a political uproar following his remarks on ‘Sanatani terrorism’. In response, Sanatan Sanstha has issued a legal notice demanding that the Congress leader issue an unconditional apology or risk a defamation lawsuit totaling Rs 10 crores.

The notice, delivered by Virendra Marathe, a trustee of Sanatan Sanstha, asserts that Chavan's comments were not only objectionable but also derogatory towards the world's wealthiest civilization. Marathe urged him to rectify his statements.

Chavan's comments came during a press briefing after the Malegaon blast verdict on a recent Friday, where he suggested that the term ‘saffron terror’ was inadequate, proposing instead ‘Sanatani terrorism’ or ‘Hindu fundamentalism’, which drew severe criticism from the BJP.

“The term saffron terrorism is misleading. If it must be used, it should be termed ‘Sanatan terrorist’ or ‘Hindu terrorist’,” he declared while recalling his government’s efforts to prohibit such Sanatan groups during his tenure.

According to the legal notice, Chavan has been given a 15-day period to provide a written apology, along with a commitment to refrain from making similar offensive comments in the future.

Ramdas Kesarkar, the legal representative for Sanatan Sanstha, described Chavan's remarks as not only defamatory but also as an affront to the religious sentiments of countless followers of Sanatan Dharma.

“Should Chavan neglect to comply with our requests, we will pursue further legal recourse and file a criminal complaint against him,” he stated.

The organization also criticized Chavan’s inconsistency by highlighting his silence when other Congress leaders, such as P. Chidambaram and Sushil Shinde, introduced the term ‘saffron terror’.

Chavan's use of ‘Sanatani terrorism’ instead of saffron terror has sparked protests from the BJP and Shiv Sena, with demonstrators demanding a retraction of his statement.

Protesters from Shiv Sena staged a sit-in outside Tilak Bhavan, the Mumbai Congress office, insisting on a public apology from Chavan.

The Malegaon verdict, delivered 17 years post a bomb explosion near a mosque in Malegaon that resulted in six fatalities and many injuries, saw a special NIA court acquit all seven defendants, including former BJP MP Pragya Thakur and Lieutenant Colonel Shrikant Purohit, citing the prosecution's inability to substantiate its case.

Point of View

It's vital to observe that this situation reflects the ongoing tension in Indian politics, where words can lead to significant ramifications. The clash between political narratives and religious sentiments showcases the delicate balance leaders must maintain while addressing sensitive topics. This incident serves as a reminder of the power of speech in shaping public discourse.
NationPress
08/10/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What prompted the defamation notice against Prithviraj Chavan?
Prithviraj Chavan made controversial remarks regarding ‘Sanatani terrorism’, which Sanatan Sanstha deemed defamatory, prompting the organization to issue a legal notice demanding an apology.
What is the financial amount involved in the defamation suit?
The defamation lawsuit amounts to Rs 10 crores.
What did Chavan say during the press conference?
Chavan stated that the term ‘saffron terror’ was inadequate and suggested using ‘Sanatani terrorism’ or ‘Hindu fundamentalism’ instead.
What is the deadline for Chavan to respond to the notice?
Chavan has been given a 15-day period to provide a written apology.
What does Sanatan Sanstha demand in their notice?
Sanatan Sanstha demands Chavan issue an unconditional apology and assure that he will refrain from making similar comments in the future.
Nation Press