Ram Temple donation theft pains crore of Hindus, says Devkinandan Thakur; renews Sanatan Board demand

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Ram Temple donation theft pains crore of Hindus, says Devkinandan Thakur; renews Sanatan Board demand

Synopsis

The reported theft of donations from the Ram Temple in Ayodhya has reignited a long-standing demand: a statutory Sanatan Board to govern Hindu temples nationwide. Kathavachak Devkinandan Thakur, invoking the pain of 100 crore Hindus, is now pressing Prime Minister Modi and Home Minister Shah to act — and the VHP chief's own distancing from the Ram Temple Trust is adding political weight to the call.

Key Takeaways

Kathavachak Devkinandan Thakur on 1 July reacted to the reported theft of donations from the Ram Temple in Ayodhya , calling it deeply painful to 100 crore Hindus .
Thakur renewed his demand for a Sanatan Board with powers similar to the Waqf Board to govern all temples across India.
VHP chief Ajay Kumar said the organisation does not accept responsibility for recent decisions by the Ram Temple trust; Thakur agreed with the stance.
Thakur urged that donations made in the name of Lord Ram be used for welfare of the poor, women, and hospitals — not for personal interests of trust members.
He appealed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah to establish the Sanatan Board and protect religious institutions.

Kathavachak Devkinandan Thakur on Wednesday, 1 July reacted sharply to the reported theft of donations from the Ram Temple in Ayodhya, saying the incident has inflicted deep pain on crores of Hindus and Sanatan followers. He simultaneously renewed his call for the creation of a Sanatan Board to oversee the management of temples and religious affairs across the country.

Thakur on the Theft

'If such an incident has indeed taken place, it has caused pain to nearly 100 crore Hindus and Sanatan followers. We should wait for the investigation to reveal the complete truth,' Thakur said. He urged restraint pending the outcome of the ongoing probe, while making clear that the episode had shaken the faith of millions of devotees who had contributed to the construction and upkeep of the temple.

Thakur added that had a respected religious preceptor been entrusted with the responsibility of managing the temple, such controversies may not have arisen in the first place. He stressed that donations made in the name of Lord Ram must be channelled toward the welfare of the poor, women, hospitals, and other public welfare initiatives — and must not serve the personal interests of individuals associated with any trust.

VHP Chief's Remarks and Thakur's Agreement

Thakur also weighed in on a statement by Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) chief Ajay Kumar, who said the organisation does not accept responsibility for recent decisions taken by the Ram Temple trust and that the VHP's role concluded once the construction of the temple was ensured. Thakur said he agreed with those remarks. 'He has worked for both the VHP and Sanatan. I agree with what he has said,' Thakur noted, underscoring that religious and administrative responsibilities need to be clearly delineated.

The Case for a Sanatan Board

Thakur has been a consistent advocate for a Sanatan Board — a statutory body modelled along the lines of the Waqf Board — that would bring all temples across the country under a unified governance framework. He argued that matters related to religion should be handled by religious leaders, while administrative and governance responsibilities should remain with the government and the administration.

'All temples across the country should be brought under the Sanatan Board. If required, any one of the four Shankaracharyas can be entrusted with the responsibility of protecting and preserving Sanatan Dharma,' he said. Notably, the demand for such a board has gained fresh momentum in the wake of the Ayodhya controversy, with several religious leaders echoing the call.

Appeal to the Centre

Appealing directly to the Central government, Thakur said, 'Whatever has happened cannot be changed now, but we must think about how to safeguard what remains.' He expressed faith in Prime Minister Narendra Modi and urged both Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah to take decisions that would protect religion and future generations. He reiterated hope that the Centre would establish a Sanatan Board with powers comparable to those of the Waqf Board.

Thakur also invoked scriptural authority, saying, 'Our scriptures say that whoever harms religion ultimately faces the consequences of their actions. Those who have committed theft are now facing punishment. If you protect religion, religion will protect you.' The incident is likely to keep the spotlight on the governance of the Ram Temple Trust in the weeks ahead, with investigators expected to submit findings soon.

Point of View

But the Ram Temple's symbolic weight makes it politically potent in a way earlier iterations were not. The VHP's public distancing from the Ram Temple Trust is significant: it signals an internal fracture within the Hindutva ecosystem over who controls the temple's legacy. The Centre will now face pressure from two directions — the demand for accountability in the trust's finances, and the broader call to institutionalise Hindu religious governance through a statutory body. How Modi responds will say as much about the BJP's relationship with its religious base as it does about temple administration.
NationPress
1 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Ram Temple donation theft case?
Reports indicate that donations collected at the Ram Temple in Ayodhya were allegedly stolen, triggering widespread outrage among Hindu devotees. The matter is under investigation, and the complete details are yet to be officially confirmed.
Who is Devkinandan Thakur and what has he demanded?
Devkinandan Thakur is a prominent Kathavachak (religious narrator) who has demanded the formation of a Sanatan Board — a statutory body to oversee the management of Hindu temples across India, with powers comparable to the Waqf Board.
What did VHP chief Ajay Kumar say about the Ram Temple Trust?
Vishwa Hindu Parishad chief Ajay Kumar stated that the VHP does not accept responsibility for recent decisions taken by the Ram Temple Trust, adding that the organisation's role concluded once the temple's construction was ensured.
What is the Sanatan Board and how would it work?
The proposed Sanatan Board would be a statutory body bringing all temples across India under a unified governance framework, with religious leaders handling faith-related matters and the government retaining administrative oversight. Thakur has suggested that one of the four Shankaracharyas could lead it.
Who has Thakur appealed to for action on the Sanatan Board?
Thakur has directly appealed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah to establish the Sanatan Board, saying it is the best way to prevent future controversies involving temple funds and management.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 21 hours ago
  2. 2 days ago
  3. 4 days ago
  4. 1 week ago
  5. 1 week ago
  6. 1 week ago
  7. 1 week ago
  8. 2 weeks ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google