Did Chidambaram's Remarks Strengthen the BJP?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a heated exchange, Rashid Alvi criticizes P. Chidambaram for remarks that he believes bolster the BJP. Alvi questions Chidambaram's motives for making claims related to US pressure on India's decision-making during the 26/11 attacks after 16 years. What implications does this have for the Congress party?
Key Takeaways
- Rashid Alvi criticizes Chidambaram's statements.
- Chidambaram claimed international pressure influenced India's response to 26/11.
- Alvi questions the timing of Chidambaram's remarks.
- Congress faces internal tensions over past decisions.
- Diplomatic channels were preferred over military action.
New Delhi, Oct 1 (NationPress) Rashid Alvi, a former Congress Rajya Sabha member, launched a strong critique against ex-Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram, claiming that his remarks are only serving to bolster the BJP by attacking the previous UPA-led administration.
This backlash comes in light of Chidambaram's recent comments regarding the government's decision-making in the aftermath of the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks.
In a recent interview, he shared that he had supported a retaliatory action against Pakistan during that crisis but was advised to pursue diplomatic avenues instead. Chidambaram emphasized how international pressure, especially from the United States, significantly influenced India's restrained approach following the tragic events.
Alvi responded vigorously, stating, "Is Chidambaram implying that the government operated under US pressure? Such assertions only serve to empower the BJP. Why is he making these claims after 16 years?"
He further noted that if Chidambaram had reservations about the decisions made at that time, he should have resigned from his role.
"If he truly disagreed back then, a resignation would have been the proper course of action. Some in Congress seem intent on undermining the party, akin to a house igniting due to its own lamp," Alvi remarked.
Questioning Chidambaram's motives, Alvi pondered the relevance of his statements after such a lengthy period.
"What purpose does it serve to declare this after 16 years? Is he attempting to demonstrate that the UPA was under American influence? It appears he seeks to bolster the BJP," Alvi stated.
In a contrasting view, Congress MP Tariq Anwar expressed skepticism regarding the claims made by the former Union Minister, saying, "I can't believe Chidambaram would make such a statement."
In the interview, Chidambaram admitted that thoughts of retaliation had crossed his mind.
"I did contemplate an act of retribution. I discussed it with the Prime Minister and key figures. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was involved in discussions during the attack, and the decision was largely shaped by the MEA and IFS to refrain from military action and focus on diplomatic solutions," he stated.
Chidambaram mentioned that the decision to hold back was made under increasing international pressure.
"The conclusion was derived amid global pressure urging us not to initiate a war," he explained.
He recounted that then US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice had visited Delhi to meet him and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, advocating against military retaliation.
Point of View
It's essential to remain neutral while highlighting the ongoing discourse within the Congress party. The clash between Rashid Alvi and P. Chidambaram underscores significant internal tensions, particularly regarding accountability and the party's narrative post-26/11. This situation warrants keen observation as it may impact the party's coherence and public perception.
NationPress
01/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Rashid Alvi accuse Chidambaram of?
Rashid Alvi accused P. Chidambaram of strengthening the BJP by making statements that target the previous UPA-led government.
What did Chidambaram reveal about the 26/11 attacks?
Chidambaram revealed that he favored a retaliatory strike against Pakistan but was advised to pursue diplomatic channels due to international pressure.
What was Alvi's response to Chidambaram's comments?
Alvi questioned the timing of Chidambaram's remarks and suggested that they serve to empower the BJP.
How did Congress MP Tariq Anwar respond?
Tariq Anwar expressed disbelief over the claims attributed to Chidambaram, suggesting that he wouldn't make such statements.
What role did international pressure play according to Chidambaram?
Chidambaram stated that the decision to exercise restraint was significantly shaped by mounting international pressure, particularly from the United States.
