CM Dhami Slams Congress Over Women's Empowerment Record
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Uttarakhand Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami fired a pointed political salvo at the Indian National Congress on Sunday, November 15, 2026, accusing the opposition party of exploiting women's issues for electoral gain while doing little for them during its own tenures in power.
Dhami's Charge: Illusion Over Action
In a post on X, CM Dhami said in Hindi: 'Mahilaon ke hitton ki andekhi karne wali Congress aaj bhi matrashakti ke naam par bhram failane ka prayas kar rahi hai' — 'Congress, which ignored the interests of women, is even today attempting to spread illusions in the name of women power.' He argued that the party failed to pursue any substantive initiative for women's uplift or empowerment during its time in government, reducing welfare rhetoric to what he called a political smokescreen.
The charge is a familiar axis in BJP–Congress exchanges across Indian states: each side contesting the other's record on women's safety, economic inclusion, and social justice. What sharpened this particular statement was the name Dhami chose to invoke.
The Ankita Bhandari Reference
Ankita Bhandari, a 19-year-old from Uttarakhand, died in 2022 in a case that sparked widespread public protests and a sustained demand for justice on women's safety in the state. The case drew intense political attention — and criticism was directed at the Dhami government itself over the pace of accountability.
Dhami directly addressed this on Sunday, calling Congress's handling of the Bhandari episode 'unfortunate.' 'Such a sensitive incident was used for politics,' he wrote, arguing that grave matters of women's honour and justice demand sensitivity and responsibility — not partisan point-scoring.
Who Is Speaking, and Why It Matters
The statement comes from the top of Uttarakhand's ruling establishment. Dhami, who has led the state since 2021 and steered the BJP to victory in the 2022 assembly elections, has consistently projected women's welfare as a governance pillar. His government has linked itself to central schemes such as 'Beti Bachao Beti Padhao' and state-level welfare programmes, though critics have questioned the speed of justice delivery in high-profile cases.
By invoking the Ankita Bhandari case, Dhami is simultaneously defending his government's record and going on offence — daring Congress to debate women's welfare on the merits rather than through what he frames as opportunistic mobilisation.
The question now is whether Congress responds in kind, and whether this exchange foreshadows a sharper contest over women's issues in Uttarakhand's next political cycle. In a state where assembly elections are a constant backdrop, the battle over who truly speaks for women may be just getting started.