CM Fadnavis joins 15th Narmada Control Authority review
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Four state chief ministers and a Union Minister converged — virtually — on Tuesday, 27 October 2026 to take stock of one of India's most consequential river-sharing arrangements. The Chief Minister's Office of Maharashtra confirmed that Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis attended the 15th Meeting of the Review Committee of the Narmada Control Authority, held online from Mantralaya, Mumbai at 3:10 PM.
Four CMs, one river, one table
Union Minister C R Paatil chaired the session, with Gujarat Chief Minister Bhupendra Patel, Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Dr. Mohan Yadav, and Rajasthan Chief Minister Bhajanlal Sharma all present alongside senior officials. The gathering brought together the political heads of every riparian state that draws from the Narmada — a rare alignment of four BJP-governed states under a single federal coordination forum.
What the Narmada Control Authority actually does
The Narmada Control Authority (NCA) is the statutory body created to implement the landmark 1979 award of the Narmada Water Disputes Tribunal, which allocated shares of the river's waters among Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Rajasthan. It monitors dam operations, water release schedules, compliance with tribunal orders, and environmental safeguards across the basin. The review committee meetings are the primary mechanism through which the four states negotiate competing demands — and avoid returning disputes to the courts.
Why the 15th review matters for basin states
The Sardar Sarovar Dam on the Narmada remains the centrepiece of the authority's oversight, with water-release decisions directly affecting millions of farmers downstream in Gujarat and parts of Rajasthan. For Maharashtra, the Narmada allocation — though smaller than Gujarat's or Madhya Pradesh's — feeds irrigation infrastructure in the state's northern districts. Regular review meetings ensure that seasonal draw-downs, reservoir levels, and sub-project timelines stay within the tribunal's guardrails. The 15th sitting of this committee signals an ongoing, institutionalised cadence of oversight rather than crisis-driven intervention.