Congress demands CEC Gyanesh Kumar's dismissal, Maharashtra agitation set for Sep 28
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Maharashtra Pradesh Congress Committee (MPCC) on Saturday, 26 September 2026, announced a statewide agitation scheduled for 28 September, escalating its confrontation with the Election Commission of India (ECI) over what the party describes as partisan conduct by Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar. The Congress is demanding Kumar's immediate dismissal and arrest, alleging he has systematically acted to benefit the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) at the expense of democratic institutions.
What Triggered the Agitation
The announcement follows allegations by Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi of widespread 'Vote Chori' (vote theft), which Congress claims are now buttressed by evidence of internal dissent within the poll panel itself. Reports indicate that fellow Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi formally recorded dissent on at least 14 occasions over the past 10 months over decisions taken during the rollout of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise — placing the controversy squarely at the centre of the Congress offensive.
The Electoral Roll Controversy
The MPCC has alleged that more than 3 crore eligible voters have been erased from Maharashtra's electoral rolls under the SIR process. Nationwide, the party claims the figure stands at 13 crore voters allegedly deprived of their franchise. The party further pointed out that while Maharashtra's voter base grew by 47 lakh electors ahead of the 2024 Assembly elections, the Commission has not clarified the current status of those newly enrolled voters. Congress also alleged that similar purges of legitimate voters occurred in other non-BJP-ruled states, including West Bengal and Bihar.
What the Party Said
MPCC president Harshwardhan Sapkal said in an official statement: 'Deleting the names of legitimate, eligible voters from the electoral rolls is an outright assault on the Constitution. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar's authoritarian conduct is a direct attack on Indian democracy.' The language signals that Congress intends to frame this not merely as an administrative dispute but as a constitutional crisis requiring a public response.
Broader Political Context
This is not an isolated protest — it forms part of a sustained opposition offensive against the ECI's handling of the SIR exercise across multiple states. The disclosure of internal dissent by two sitting Election Commissioners is particularly significant, as it suggests the controversy extends beyond party politics into the functioning of the poll body itself. The planned 28 September agitation across Maharashtra will be a key test of whether opposition momentum on electoral integrity concerns translates into visible street-level mobilisation. All eyes will now be on how the Election Commission responds to mounting political and institutional pressure.