Why Is CPI(M) Condemning the 'Push-Back' of Suspected Bangladeshi Infiltrators?

Click to start listening
Why Is CPI(M) Condemning the 'Push-Back' of Suspected Bangladeshi Infiltrators?

Synopsis

The CPI(M) has vehemently condemned the push-back of suspected Bangladeshi infiltrators along the Indo-Bangladesh border, calling for legal procedures to be followed. This controversial action has sparked debates on communal policies and the treatment of migrants in India, raising questions about the implications for national unity and justice.

Key Takeaways

  • CPI(M) condemns illegal deportations.
  • Call for adherence to legal procedures.
  • Concerns over targeting of Bengali-speaking Muslims.
  • Accusations against Assam government for communal policies.
  • Advocacy for dignity and fair trials for migrants.

Kolkata, May 31 (NationPress) The CPI(M) Polit Bureau, on Saturday, strongly criticized the deportation and push-back of alleged Bangladeshi nationals at the Indo-Bangladesh border. They have urged the government to address the situation by following the appropriate legal procedures for those who have entered the country illegally.

“Following the terrorist incident at Pahalgam, the state governments led by the BJP and the Central government are specifically targeting Bengali-speaking Muslims, pushing many into Bangladesh without proper verification. Reports indicate that some authentic Indian citizens have also been wrongfully arrested and deported. Those individuals labeled as foreign nationals by Foreigners Tribunals, yet awaiting appeal decisions in the Assam High Court and the Supreme Court, should not be forcibly sent back. Such actions are unacceptable,” stated the CPI(M) Polit Bureau.

The party also accused the Assam government of pursuing divisive communal policies and noted that they have chosen to arm the ‘indigenous people’.

“This is a perilous move with significant implications. The government needs to uphold law and order while simultaneously preventing infiltration. Simply pushing back individuals and targeting certain communities is not a viable solution,” the statement emphasized.

The CPI(M) leaders further insisted that the government refrain from using religion as a basis for identifying illegal migrants.

“Individuals who have crossed the border unlawfully should be guaranteed a fair legal process. Poor and undocumented migrants entering the country without malicious intent deserve to be treated with respect and handled according to established procedures,” the Polit Bureau remarked.

The West Bengal BJP unit claimed that leftist parties always oppose decisive actions against infiltrators, merely for political appeasement. “In West Bengal, while the ruling Trinamool Congress encourages illegal infiltration, CPI(M) is simultaneously opposing measures against these infiltrators. Both parties represent two sides of the same coin,” a BJP state committee member commented.

Point of View

It is imperative to approach this sensitive issue from a balanced perspective. The CPI(M) raises valid concerns regarding the treatment of individuals at our borders, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal frameworks. While national security is paramount, it is equally crucial to ensure that human rights are upheld. The discussion surrounding illegal migration must remain rooted in facts and empathy, rather than divisive ideologies.
NationPress
08/06/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CPI(M)'s stance on the push-back of Bangladeshi infiltrators?
The CPI(M) strongly condemns the push-back and deportation of suspected Bangladeshi citizens, urging the government to follow legal procedures for handling illegal migrants.
What concerns does the CPI(M) raise about deportations?
The CPI(M) highlights the wrongful deportation of genuine Indian citizens and emphasizes the need for fair trials for those entering the country illegally.
How does the BJP respond to the CPI(M)'s criticism?
The BJP claims that leftist parties like the CPI(M) oppose necessary actions against infiltrators for political reasons, citing their support for illegal infiltration.