Delhi court grants bail to influencer Swatantra Bhardwaj in Jantar Mantar assault case

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Delhi court grants bail to influencer Swatantra Bhardwaj in Jantar Mantar assault case

Synopsis

The Patiala House Court has granted regular bail to influencer Swatantra Bhardwaj, who admitted to the assault in a viral video and then claimed self-defence. With SC/ST Act provisions added after a revised complainant statement and a separate POCSO complaint still pending, his legal battle is far from over.

Key Takeaways

The Patiala House Court granted regular bail to influencer Swatantra Bhardwaj in the Jantar Mantar assault case.
Bhardwaj was previously given three weeks' interim bail on 15 September while his regular bail plea was being heard.
He is accused of assaulting Sanjay Kumar , father of a minor activist, during a protest in July ; Delhi Police described injuries as 'simple' in nature.
The FIR includes provisions of the BNS , the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act , and criminal intimidation; SC/ST provisions were added after a revised complaint statement.
A separate POCSO Act FIR was registered against Bhardwaj following harassment allegations by the minor activist.
Bhardwaj was arrested in Bulandshahr, Uttar Pradesh on 4 September ; his habeas corpus petition was dismissed by the Delhi High Court .

The Patiala House Court in New Delhi has granted regular bail to self-styled influencer Swatantra Bhardwaj, who was arrested in connection with the alleged assault of the father of a minor activist during a protest at Jantar Mantar in July. The development comes weeks after the court had previously extended interim relief to Bhardwaj pending a final decision on his bail application.

Background of the Case

Bhardwaj is accused of assaulting Sanjay Kumar, the father of a minor protester, during the Jantar Mantar demonstration. The case drew significant public attention after a purported viral video surfaced in which Bhardwaj allegedly admitted to the assault and claimed he had been let off owing to his 'political connections.' Bhardwaj subsequently told the media that he had acted in self-defence.

The First Information Report (FIR) invokes relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and provisions relating to criminal intimidation. A separate FIR was also registered against Bhardwaj under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act on the complaint of the minor activist, who alleged online rape threats and harassment.

Key Developments in Court

The Patiala House Court had on 15 September granted Bhardwaj three weeks' interim bail while considering his regular bail plea. During the September hearing, the court questioned the Delhi Police on whether Bhardwaj had used caste-indicative language during the alleged incident. The prosecution submitted that the initial complaint made no mention of such language, and that the allegation was added subsequently when the complainant's statement was recorded a second time — after which provisions of the SC/ST Act were incorporated into the FIR.

The Delhi Police had earlier characterised the injuries sustained by complainant Sanjay Kumar as 'simple' in nature, reportedly caused by a steel bracelet.

Arrest and High Court Proceedings

Bhardwaj was detained in Uttar Pradesh's Bulandshahr district on 4 September, hours after representatives of the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) met senior Delhi Police officials and demanded his arrest. A habeas corpus petition filed by Bhardwaj challenging his detention was subsequently dismissed by the Delhi High Court. A bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja rejected the plea after Delhi Police submitted it was not maintainable, as Bhardwaj had already been placed in judicial custody.

What This Means Going Forward

With regular bail now granted, Bhardwaj's case will continue before the trial court. The contested inclusion of SC/ST Act provisions — added after an amended complainant statement — is likely to remain a central legal question as the case proceeds. The POCSO complaint lodged by the minor activist adds another dimension that courts will address separately.

Point of View

The addition of SC/ST Act provisions only after a second recorded statement, a sequence the court itself flagged. A viral admission-of-guilt video that preceded a self-defence claim, combined with political-connection allegations, has made this more than a routine assault matter. The parallel POCSO complaint keeps the case multi-layered, and how courts weigh these overlapping charges will test procedural consistency. The involvement of an organised political outfit in demanding the arrest also warrants scrutiny of how civil society pressure interacts with police discretion in high-visibility cases.
NationPress
6 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why was Swatantra Bhardwaj arrested?
Swatantra Bhardwaj was arrested for allegedly assaulting Sanjay Kumar, the father of a minor activist, during a protest at Jantar Mantar in July. The case gained attention after a viral video surfaced in which Bhardwaj allegedly admitted to the assault and claimed he was let off due to political connections.
What charges does Swatantra Bhardwaj face?
Bhardwaj faces charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and provisions relating to criminal intimidation. A separate FIR under the POCSO Act was also registered against him on the complaint of the minor activist, who alleged online rape threats and harassment.
Why were SC/ST Act provisions added to the FIR?
According to the prosecution, the initial complaint did not mention any caste-indicative language by Bhardwaj. The allegation was added subsequently when the complainant recorded a second statement, after which SC/ST Act provisions were incorporated into the FIR. The Patiala House Court had questioned Delhi Police about this during the September hearing.
What happened at the Delhi High Court?
The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by Bhardwaj challenging his arrest. A bench of Justices Navin Chawla and Ravinder Dudeja rejected the plea after Delhi Police submitted it was not maintainable because Bhardwaj had already been placed in judicial custody.
What happens next in the case?
With regular bail now granted, Bhardwaj's trial will continue before the Patiala House Court. The contested inclusion of SC/ST Act provisions and the separately pending POCSO complaint are expected to be central legal questions as proceedings progress.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 weeks ago
  2. 3 weeks ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 3 months ago
  7. 4 months ago
  8. 4 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google