CJP demands FIR against man who boasts of assaulting protester's father in viral video

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
CJP demands FIR against man who boasts of assaulting protester's father in viral video

Synopsis

A man openly bragged in a viral video that he cracked open the skull of a minor protester's father at Jantar Mantar — and that a politician's phone call kept him out of jail. CJP's march to Parliament Street Police Station on 4 September puts Delhi Police's inaction squarely in the spotlight, with allegations of caste-targeted violence and political shielding adding layers to what is already a disturbing case.

Key Takeaways

The CJP marched to Parliament Street Police Station on 4 September demanding an FIR and arrest of a man seen boasting in a viral video about assaulting a protester's father.
The accused allegedly struck Sanjay , father of minor protester Nishu , on the head with a metal bracelet during a sit-in at Jantar Mantar .
The man claimed in the video that he was released by Delhi Police due to 'political connections' and that a politician's call secured his freedom.
CJP alleged the family is Dalit and pressed for charges under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and attempt-to-murder provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — requests police reportedly declined.
The accused also allegedly threatened Nishu in the same video, saying 'We will see her too' .
CJP leaders called it a 'shameful day for democracy' and said they would escalate legally if police fail to act.

The Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) marched to the Parliament Street Police Station in New Delhi on Friday, 4 September, demanding the registration of a first information report (FIR) under stringent provisions and the immediate arrest of a man who, in a widely circulated video, openly claimed to have grievously assaulted the father of a student protester at Jantar Mantar. The man further boasted in the video that Delhi Police released him owing to his 'political connections' — an allegation that CJP leaders described as a 'shameful day' for the country and for democracy.

What the Viral Video Shows

The video in question, which spread rapidly across social media, purportedly shows the accused admitting that he struck Sanjay, the father of a minor girl named Nishu, on the head using a metal bracelet during a sit-in protest. CJP co-convener Saurav Das told reporters on the way to the police station: 'Nishu, who is a minor, had participated in our protest at Jantar Mantar from the beginning itself. Her father, Sanjay ji, also used to accompany her. During our peaceful sit-in protest, some members of a criminal gang entered and undertook violence. They broke Sanjay ji's head using a metal bracelet.'

In the same video, the accused allegedly threatened Nishu directly, saying, 'We will see her too' — a remark CJP leaders flagged as an active threat to a minor.

CJP's Allegations Against Delhi Police

Das alleged that when an initial FIR was registered, the CJP pressed police to invoke charges of attempt to murder and relevant sections of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, arguing there was a caste dimension to the attack since the family belongs to a Dalit community. 'But the police didn't do anything like that. When we pressurised the police, they told us to get an order from the court. Since then, there hasn't been much progress in this case,' Das claimed.

He further alleged: 'Police have themselves said that 2,800 hardened criminals were present during the protest. Then why no action was taken against them?' Das said that all evidence — including videos mocking Nishu and threatening her father — had been submitted to police, but that the accused continued to move freely.

What the CJP Is Demanding

The delegation, which included Nishu and her father Sanjay, sought a meeting with senior police officials at Parliament Street Police Station. CJP leaders demanded the identification and arrest of those involved under stringent sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Das said the group would 'see what to do next' after gauging the police response.

CJP co-convener Ashutosh Ranka told reporters: 'Now, the condition in the country's capital has become such that goons are openly admitting that they broke open Sanjay ji's head. It was a complete attempt to kill him. He himself is admitting that an attempt to murder case should be made against him, but the Delhi Police, under the protection of a politician, did not take any action against that person.'

Political Connections Claim and Broader Implications

The accused allegedly stated in the viral podcast interview that he escaped custody following a call from a politician — a claim that, if verified, would raise serious questions about political interference in law enforcement. Ranka called the situation 'a shameful day for the country and democracy where goons are openly claiming that they have attempted to kill someone and still no action is being taken against them because they are politically connected.'

This comes amid broader concerns over the safety of peaceful protesters and the accountability of law enforcement in the capital. The CJP has indicated it will escalate the matter legally if police fail to act on the delegation's demands.

Point of View

A confidence that only makes sense if impunity is real and not merely perceived. Delhi Police's reported refusal to invoke attempt-to-murder charges, despite a self-incriminating viral video, demands explanation. The caste dimension — a Dalit family alleging targeted violence at a protest — adds a layer that courts and civil society will scrutinise closely. When an accused can threaten a minor on camera and still walk free, the accountability deficit is not a procedural gap; it is a structural failure.
NationPress
4 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CJP demanding in the Jantar Mantar assault case?
The CJP is demanding the registration of an FIR under attempt-to-murder provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and relevant sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, along with the immediate arrest of the accused. The group marched to Parliament Street Police Station on 4 September to press these demands before senior officers.
What did the accused admit in the viral video?
In a widely circulated podcast interview, the accused allegedly admitted to striking Sanjay — father of minor protester Nishu — on the head with a metal bracelet during a sit-in protest at Jantar Mantar. He also reportedly claimed that a politician's phone call secured his release from police custody.
Why is the SC/ST Act being invoked in this case?
The CJP alleges there is a caste angle to the assault because the victim's family belongs to a Dalit community. The organisation had earlier urged Delhi Police to add SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act charges to the initial FIR, but claims police declined to do so.
What threat was made against the minor protester Nishu?
According to CJP co-convener Saurav Das, the accused targeted Nishu in the same viral video and said 'We will see her too' — a statement the CJP characterised as a direct threat against a minor. Das said reels mocking Nishu and threatening her father had all been submitted to police.
What action has Delhi Police taken so far?
An initial FIR was registered in the case, but the CJP alleges police refused to add attempt-to-murder or SC/ST Act charges and instead directed the organisation to seek a court order. The accused has reportedly remained free despite the viral video surfacing, which the CJP describes as evidence of political shielding.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 1 month ago
  6. 1 month ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google