Has Delhi HC Closed the Suit on Ramdev's Assurance Against Using Communal Slurs?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Delhi High Court has closed the lawsuit concerning Baba Ramdev's controversial remarks, accepting his commitment to avoid using communal slurs against Hamdard. This ruling comes amidst the ongoing scrutiny of his statements, marking a significant moment in the battle between competing summer beverage brands. Dive deeper into the implications of this case.
Key Takeaways
- Patanjali's Baba Ramdev pledges to avoid communal slurs.
- The Delhi High Court closes the 'Sharbat Jihad' case.
- Ramdev has removed controversial content from public platforms.
- The court criticized Ramdev's earlier statements as 'indefensible.'
- This case highlights the importance of responsible speech in business.
New Delhi, May 9 (NationPress) The Delhi High Court has concluded a lawsuit concerning the term 'Sharbat Jihad' after accepting Patanjali's founder Baba Ramdev's commitment to avoid using communal slurs against competing summer beverage producer Hamdard in the future.
Justice Amit Bansal acknowledged an affidavit from Ramdev in which he pledged to abstain from making derogatory remarks or producing disparaging videos and advertisements regarding rival companies.
In the affidavit submitted by Ramdev's legal representative, the Yoga guru confirmed that he has removed all related advertisements—whether in print, video format, or on social media—that pertained to his controversial statements.
The phrase 'Sharbat Jihad' originated when Ramdev was endorsing Patanjali's 'Gulab Sharbat', alleging that Hamdard was using proceeds from its drink 'Rooh Afza' to finance mosques and madrasas.
Previously, the court had criticized Ramdev, labeling his remarks as “indefensible” and something that “shocks the conscience of the court” while reviewing the lawsuit initiated by Hamdard National Foundation India against Patanjali Foods Limited.
The High Court expressed strong disapproval of a recent video released by Ramdev during the ongoing court proceedings, which targeted 'Rooh Afza' and allegedly connected it to 'Sharbat Jihad'.
In his defense, Ramdev stated that he did not mention any specific brand or community in the video.
During the previous hearing on April 22, Justice Bansal was informed that Ramdev had uploaded another objectionable video against Hamdard, despite his earlier promise to refrain from making such statements, advertisements, and social media posts henceforth.
As a consequence, the High Court remarked that the latest video appeared to be prima facie contemptuous and indicated it would issue a contempt notice to Ramdev, in addition to requesting his presence.
The court had instructed Ramdev to submit an undertaking on affidavit confirming that he would not issue any such statements, advertisements, or social media posts in the future.
Point of View
This case reflects the delicate balance between freedom of speech and the responsibility that comes with public statements, particularly when they may incite communal discord. It is crucial for public figures like Baba Ramdev to exercise caution in their discourse, ensuring that competition does not devolve into division.
NationPress
21/05/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is 'Sharbat Jihad' related to?
The term 'Sharbat Jihad' refers to the controversy sparked by Baba Ramdev's comments regarding rival beverage maker Hamdard and its product 'Rooh Afza'.
What assurance did Baba Ramdev give?
Baba Ramdev assured the court that he would refrain from making disparaging remarks or advertisements against competing companies in the future.
What was the court's reaction to Ramdev's previous comments?
The court found Ramdev's earlier comments to be 'indefensible' and expressed its disapproval of his continued remarks during ongoing proceedings.
What impact does this ruling have on the beverage industry?
This ruling emphasizes the importance of responsible communication in the competitive beverage industry, potentially setting a precedent for future cases.
Has Ramdev removed his controversial content?
Yes, Ramdev has confirmed that he has taken down all advertisements and social media posts related to his controversial remarks.
