Will the Delhi HC Hear the ED's Plea Against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The Delhi High Court is gearing up to hear a significant plea from the ED against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi concerning the National Herald case. This pivotal legal battle raises questions about political accountability and the implications of alleged money laundering in high-profile circles.
Key Takeaways
- The Delhi High Court will hear the ED's plea against Sonia and Rahul Gandhi.
- The case involves serious allegations of money laundering and conspiracy.
- The trial court previously dismissed the ED's complaint.
- The Congress party denies all allegations against its leaders.
- Legal proceedings are ongoing, with significant implications for political accountability.
New Delhi, Dec 21 (NationPress) The Delhi High Court is set to address a criminal revision petition on Monday brought forth by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). This plea challenges a trial court's decision that declined to acknowledge its money laundering complaint against Sonia Gandhi, the Chairperson of the Congress Parliamentary Party, Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, and several others involved in the alleged National Herald case.
According to the causelist available on the Delhi HC's website, a single-judge Bench led by Justice Ravinder Dudeja will review the ED's request against the Rouse Avenue Court's ruling, which dismissed its prosecution complaint filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
Previously, on Tuesday, Special Judge (PC Act) Vishal Gogne of the Rouse Avenue Court had rejected the ED's complaint, stating it was not legally sustainable.
While the court granted relief to Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, it clarified that the ED retains the right to pursue its investigation in accordance with the law. In addition to the Gandhis, the ED has named Sam Pitroda, Suman Dubey, Sunil Bhandari, Young Indian, and Dotex Merchandise Private Limited as proposed accused in this matter.
This high-profile case centers around allegations that senior leaders of the Congress party conspired to unlawfully gain control of assets exceeding Rs 2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Ltd (AJL), the original publisher of the National Herald newspaper, by making a minimal payment of Rs 50 lakh through Young Indian, a company where Sonia and Rahul Gandhi are majority stakeholders.
The ED has maintained that this case involves a serious economic offense and claimed that a conspiracy was devised to create Young Indian with the intent of appropriating AJL's properties for a nominal amount, primarily benefiting top Congress leaders.
Additionally, the ED alleged that several senior Congress figures participated in “fake transactions,” including issuing fraudulent advance rent payments backed by forged rent receipts. However, the Congress leadership has continually denied these allegations, labeling the money laundering case as “remarkably strange” and “unprecedented.”
The controversy surrounding the National Herald's assets gained attention in 2012 when BJP leader Subramanian Swamy lodged a complaint in a trial court, accusing Congress leaders of engaging in cheating and breach of trust during the acquisition of AJL.
Point of View
It's essential to remain unbiased while covering significant legal developments involving influential political figures. The case's complexity emphasizes the need for thorough investigation and transparency, ensuring that justice prevails in the face of serious allegations.
NationPress
23/12/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the National Herald case about?
The National Herald case involves allegations against senior Congress leaders, including Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, for allegedly conspiring to illegally acquire assets worth over Rs 2,000 crore belonging to Associated Journals Ltd through a nominal payment.
What is the role of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in this case?
The ED is investigating the case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, aiming to determine if there was any money laundering or economic offenses committed by the accused.
What was the trial court's decision regarding the ED's complaint?
The trial court, led by Special Judge Vishal Gogne, declined to take cognizance of the ED's complaint, stating that it was not maintainable in law.
What are the next steps for the ED following the trial court's ruling?
The ED is appealing the trial court's decision in the Delhi High Court, seeking to challenge the dismissal of its prosecution complaint.
How has the Congress party responded to the allegations?
The Congress leadership has consistently denied the allegations, describing the money laundering case as strange and unprecedented.
