Why Did the Delhi High Court Stop the Release of 'Udaipur Files'?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- The Delhi High Court has paused the release of 'Udaipur Files'.
- The film is based on the Kanhaiya Lal murder case.
- Concerns over communal tensions prompted the legal action.
- The Centre is required to respond to revision pleas within a week.
- The ruling highlights the balance between artistic freedom and public order.
New Delhi, July 10 (NationPress) The Delhi High Court has put a temporary stop on the release of the film 'Udaipur Files' as it awaits a decision from the Centre regarding the revision plea submitted by the petitioners who are contesting the CBFC certification of this movie, which is centered around the high-profile Kanhaiya Lal murder case.
The film, which was scheduled for a worldwide release on Friday, depicts the shocking murder of Kanhaiya Lal, a tailor from Udaipur, Rajasthan, who was killed in June 2022 by Mohammad Riyaz Attari and Ghaus Mohammad in a brutal attack.
A Bench comprising Chief Justice D.K. Upadhyaya and Justice Anish Dayal addressed a series of petitions, including one from Maulana Arshad Madani, the leader of the Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind, who is seeking to annul the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) approval granted to the film.
According to Madani's petition, the CBFC's certification process violated Section 5B of the Cinematograph Act, 1952, as well as the Guidelines for Certification of Films for Public Exhibition. He argued that the film’s release could exacerbate communal discord and disturb public peace, endangering the country's religious harmony.
The Bench instructed that both the petitioners and the public could submit revision pleas to the Union government under Section 6 of the Cinematograph Act within two days. This section empowers the Centre to label a film as uncertified or to impose interim measures, which may include halting the film's public exhibition.
The Delhi High Court directed the Centre to resolve the revision pleas within a week, ensuring the producer has an opportunity for a hearing. The court also stated that any requests for interim relief would be considered and decided upon.
During a hearing on Wednesday, the Delhi High Court noted the statement made by Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, revealing that the CBFC had suggested certain edits prior to certification, which the film's producer subsequently implemented.
The court had previously requested a private screening of the film and its trailer for the legal representatives involved in the case, with further hearings scheduled for Thursday (July 10).