Delhi Police files FIR against influencer Amir Shokeen in racial abuse video case

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Delhi Police files FIR against influencer Amir Shokeen in racial abuse video case

Synopsis

A viral video allegedly showing social media influencer Amir Shokeen racially abusing a man from Tripura has triggered FIRs in both Delhi and Tripura, political intervention from Union Minister Kiren Rijiju, and a formal complaint citing slurs including 'Chinki' and 'Chinese'. Shokeen's scripted-video defence has not forestalled legal action — and a prior criminal record has come to light.

Key Takeaways

Delhi Police registered an FIR against influencer Amir Shokeen on 22 October 2026 at Sadar Bazar police station under BNS Sections 192, 196, 352, and 353.
Tripura Police independently registered a separate case under relevant legal provisions.
The Tripura Students Forum Delhi (TSF'D) filed a formal complaint alleging use of racial slurs including 'Chinki' and 'Chinese' in the video.
Shokeen claimed the video was scripted and described the exchange as humour, but the apology did not prevent legal action.
Union Minister Kiren Rijiju raised the issue on social media, drawing wider political attention to the case.
Officials confirmed prior IPC cases — under Sections 323, 324, 504, and 506 — had previously been registered against Shokeen .

Delhi Police on Thursday, 22 October 2026, registered a First Information Report (FIR) against social media influencer Amir Shokeen at the Sadar Bazar police station, in connection with an alleged incident of racial harassment and humiliation of an individual from Tripura, reportedly depicted in a video that went viral on social media. The case has been registered under Sections 192, 196, 352, and 353 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

The Viral Video and Allegations

The video, which spread rapidly across social media platforms, allegedly shows Shokeen subjecting a man from Tripura to racial slurs and humiliating treatment. According to a formal complaint filed by the Tripura Students Forum Delhi (TSF'D), the video purportedly depicts the individual being subjected to sexual assault, harassment, and humiliation by the content creator.

The Forum alleged that the video contained racially derogatory terms, including 'Chinki' and 'Chinese', directed at the individual on account of his perceived ethnic or regional identity. It further alleged that derogatory language was used to refer to Tripura itself — described as an insult not only to the individual but to the people of the state at large.

Shokeen's Response and Prior Cases

Following the public backlash, Shokeen issued an apology. In a Facebook post, he claimed the video was scripted and that the man featured in it was known to him — someone who had previously worked at a friend's café in Ahmedabad. Shokeen described the exchange as a humorous skit in which both participants were joking, maintaining he had no intention of insulting anyone.

This is not the first time Shokeen has faced legal action. Officials confirmed that cases under Sections 323, 324, 504, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) had previously been registered against the influencer.

Tripura Police Acts; Forum Files Formal Complaint

The Tripura Police also separately registered a case under relevant legal provisions before the Delhi FIR was filed. The Tripura Students Forum Delhi had earlier submitted a formal complaint to the Delhi Police, seeking urgent registration of an FIR and immediate investigation into the matter.

In its complaint, the TSF'D stated: 'Such expressions, when used to demean or humiliate a person on account of their perceived ethnic or regional identity, raise serious concerns about racial prejudice, dignity and equal treatment.' The Forum stressed that, if the allegations were established through investigation, they would raise grave concerns about the protection of people from the Northeast against racial discrimination and harassment.

Political Attention and What Comes Next

The case drew national political attention after Union Minister Kiren Rijiju raised the issue on social media, amplifying pressure on law enforcement to act. The dual FIRs — in Delhi and Tripura — signal coordinated multi-jurisdictional scrutiny of the influencer.

With charges now formally lodged in two states and a prior criminal record cited by officials, investigators are expected to examine the video, the circumstances of its creation, and the nature of the relationship between Shokeen and the individual involved. The case highlights the growing legal accountability for social media content that targets individuals on ethnic or regional grounds, particularly those from India's Northeast.

Point of View

Often behind the shield of 'it was just a joke.' The scripted-video defence, deployed after the backlash peaked rather than before, will be a key credibility test for investigators. What is notable here is the speed of institutional response: dual FIRs across two states, a ministerial social media intervention, and a formal student body complaint within days. That escalation reflects both the severity of the alleged conduct and the broader, long-standing demand from Northeastern communities for equal protection from ethnic discrimination — a demand that laws on the books have historically been slow to fulfil.
NationPress
22 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Amir Shokeen racial abuse case about?
The case involves a viral video allegedly showing social media influencer Amir Shokeen racially harassing and humiliating a man from Tripura, with alleged use of slurs including 'Chinki' and 'Chinese'. Delhi Police registered an FIR against Shokeen on 22 October 2026 at the Sadar Bazar police station under Sections 192, 196, 352, and 353 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
What charges has Amir Shokeen been booked under?
In the Delhi FIR, Shokeen has been charged under Sections 192, 196, 352, and 353 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). A separate case has also been registered by the Tripura Police under relevant legal provisions.
How did Amir Shokeen respond to the viral video backlash?
Shokeen issued an apology after the video circulated widely. In a Facebook post, he claimed the video was scripted and that the man featured was known to him, describing the exchange as humour in which both parties were joking. He maintained he had no intention of insulting anyone.
Who pushed for the FIR to be filed?
The Tripura Students Forum Delhi (TSF'D) submitted a formal complaint to Delhi Police seeking urgent registration of an FIR and investigation. Union Minister Kiren Rijiju also raised the issue on social media, adding political pressure on law enforcement to act.
Does Amir Shokeen have prior criminal cases?
Yes. Officials confirmed that cases under Sections 323, 324, 504, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code had been registered against Shokeen previously, making this not his first encounter with law enforcement.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 hour ago
  2. 3 hours ago
  3. 5 hours ago
  4. 20 hours ago
  5. 22 hours ago
  6. 23 hours ago
  7. 5 months ago
  8. 9 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google