CM Dhami: Congress blames constitutional bodies for poll losses
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Twelve years of consecutive electoral setbacks, and Uttarakhand Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami says the Indian National Congress has still not looked inward — choosing instead to point fingers at the very institutions that underpin India's democracy. The BJP leader fired the broadside on Saturday, 31 October 2026, in a pointed Hindi-language post on X.
Posting in Hindi, CM Dhami wrote: '2014 ke baad se lagatar mil rahi chunavi parajayon se Congress sabak lene ke bajay apni vifaltaon ka thikra sanvaidhanik sansthao par fodti aa rahi hai.' — ('Instead of learning from the continuous electoral defeats it has suffered since 2014, Congress has been blaming its failures on constitutional institutions.') He added pointedly: 'Questioning constitutional institutions has become Congress's habit.'The EVM fault-line that never goes away
The target of Dhami's remarks is a well-worn pattern in Indian electoral politics. After the BJP's landmark 2014 Lok Sabha victory — and every major loss for the Congress in the years since — senior opposition figures have questioned the integrity of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) and raised doubts about the conduct of the Election Commission of India, one of the country's premier constitutional bodies. The BJP has consistently characterised those objections as sour-grapes deflection rather than legitimate institutional scrutiny.
Dhami's formulation is sharper than most: he is not merely defending a particular election result, but framing the behaviour itself as a character flaw — 'fitrat' (habit or nature) — embedded in the Congress's political DNA. That framing is designed to pre-empt future complaints as much as rebut past ones.
A BJP counter-narrative built over a decade
The exchange is not new, but it has grown more entrenched with each election cycle. Since 2014, the Congress has lost multiple Lok Sabha and state assembly contests. Each loss has triggered a fresh round of institutional questioning from the opposition and a fresh round of 'accept the verdict' messaging from the ruling party. CM Dhami's post compresses that decade-long dynamic into two sentences — reflecting how thoroughly it has been absorbed into BJP's political vocabulary.
With state assembly elections periodically on the horizon, the timing of such messaging is rarely accidental. Accusations framed now seed a public narrative that any future opposition challenge to election outcomes will be dismissed as a reflex rather than a reasoned objection.
What Congress and the Election Commission may say next
Congress spokespersons are likely to push back — arguing that raising institutional concerns is not deflection but democratic accountability, and that the party has won elections since 2014 where its objections were not raised. The Election Commission of India, which guards its constitutional independence carefully, has historically declined to engage with partisan point-scoring from either side.
The sharper question hanging over Indian democracy is whether the EVM and institutional-integrity debate ever gets resolved on its merits — or whether it simply becomes permanent ammunition in the BJP-Congress war of narratives, fired and returned with every poll result. Dhami's post suggests the BJP, at least, is comfortable keeping it that way.