Did the Dharmasthala case whistleblower take a skull to Delhi before filing a complaint?

Click to start listening
Did the Dharmasthala case whistleblower take a skull to Delhi before filing a complaint?

Synopsis

In a shocking revelation, Karnataka's Deputy Chief Minister D. K. Shivakumar confirms that Chinnaiah, the whistleblower in the Dharmasthala mass grave case, took a skull to Delhi before lodging complaints. As the investigation unfolds, the government aims to bring transparency to the case, amidst political turmoil and accusations of conspiracy.

Key Takeaways

  • D. K. Shivakumar confirms Chinnaiah's actions regarding the skull.
  • The government aims for transparency in the Dharmasthala investigation.
  • The establishment of the SIT has led to political controversy.
  • The Supreme Court's dismissal of the PIL emphasizes local authority involvement.
  • Political tensions continue as accusations of conspiracy arise.

Bengaluru, Sep 27 (NationPress) Karnataka's Deputy Chief Minister D. K. Shivakumar has verified that Chinnaiah, known as the masked figure, transported a skull to Delhi prior to filing complaints concerning the mass grave incident.

During a media interaction at his residence in Sadashivanagar on Saturday, Shivakumar addressed several inquiries.

"The primary goal of our government is to unveil the truths surrounding the Dharmasthala case to the public," Deputy Chief Minister Shivakumar emphasized while responding to a statement from Dharmadhikari of Dharmasthala, Veerendra Heggade, who expressed gratitude to the Congress-led administration for a thorough investigation.

In response to a question regarding Heggade's comment that the establishment of the SIT (Special Investigation Team) has absolved him from any blame, Shivakumar remarked, "Let’s await the investigation report first. I'll comment after that. I've noted Heggade's statement in the media. It’s premature to comment before the report is out."

"Politicians might express varying opinions. However, I represent the government and cannot speak like others. Once the report is finalized, either the Chief Minister or the Home Minister will provide an official statement. I will share my thoughts afterward," he clarified.

When questioned about whether the government would act against individuals allegedly attempting to mislead the public despite the Supreme Court rejecting the PIL, he stated, "This is not the appropriate time for that discussion. A petition was brought before the Supreme Court, and it was dismissed."

Shivakumar maintained that the court instructed the petitioners to approach local authorities to pursue their investigative requests and sent them back.

"No one is addressing the Supreme Court’s directives. They traveled all the way to Delhi with the skull. However, let the investigation team officially present the report to us," Shivakumar asserted.

Previously, Shivakumar ignited controversy by alleging a conspiracy aimed at tarnishing the reputation of the Hindu pilgrimage site Dharmasthala.

This statement embarrassed the Congress-led government, with the BJP criticizing the state administration.

T. Jayanth, an activist opposing temple authorities, revealed that alongside complainant Chinnaiah and others, they drove to Delhi with a skull to seek guidance on the case.

Heggade, a member of the BJP Rajya Sabha, stated on Friday that the SIT investigating the mass grave case is uncovering the truth, expressing gratitude to the Congress-led state government.

BJP State President B. Y. Vijayendra stated, "The Congress-led administration is actively facilitating a coordinated effort aimed at discrediting and undermining the esteemed Hindu religious site, Sri Kshetra Dharmasthala."

Point of View

The unfolding events surrounding the Dharmasthala case highlight the complexity of legal and political dynamics in India. The government's commitment to transparency must be balanced against the backdrop of heightened political tensions and public scrutiny, ensuring that justice prevails and the truth is revealed.
NationPress
14/11/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Dharmasthala case about?
The Dharmasthala case revolves around allegations of a mass grave discovered in the region, prompting investigations into its origins and implications for the local community.
Who is Chinnaiah?
Chinnaiah, referred to as the masked man, is the whistleblower in the Dharmasthala case, who has made significant claims regarding the investigation.
What role does the SIT play in the investigation?
The Special Investigation Team (SIT) has been formed to conduct a thorough investigation into the matters surrounding the Dharmasthala case.
What did the Supreme Court rule regarding the case?
The Supreme Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) related to the case, advising petitioners to approach local authorities for further action.
What are the political implications of this case?
The case has sparked political controversy, with accusations from the BJP against the Congress-led government of attempting to discredit a significant Hindu pilgrimage site.
Nation Press