Are Two Government Doctors Challenging 'Arbitrary' Postings at Calcutta HC?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a significant move, two senior doctors from West Bengal have filed a petition against the state Health Department's alleged arbitrary postings at the Calcutta High Court. Their actions highlight serious concerns about transparency in the medical administration system, raising questions about the fairness of the allocation process.
Key Takeaways
- Legal action has been initiated against arbitrary postings.
- Concerns over transparency in medical administration are rising.
- The support from the WBJDF emphasizes unity among medical professionals.
- Justice for the junior doctor victim remains a pivotal issue.
- Future implications for the medical community's posting system could be significant.
Kolkata, May 30 (NationPress) The government of West Bengal is currently facing another legal dispute concerning the alleged unjust postings of three senior resident doctors by the state Health Department. Two of these doctors have approached the Calcutta High Court to contest the decision.
The petition submitted by Debasish Halder and Asfaqulla Naiya has been accepted by the single-judge vacation bench led by Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee. The initial hearing is tentatively scheduled for June 5.
It remains uncertain if Aniket Mahato, the third senior resident allegedly affected by these arbitrary postings, will join this case or file a separate petition.
All three doctors were prominent figures in the protest against the horrific rape and murder of a junior female doctor at R.G. Kar Medical College & Hospital in Kolkata last August.
Despite attending the counselling session, all three were assigned to distant locations, disregarding their preferred choices. Notably, Halder was placed at a hospital that currently has no official openings for senior residents.
Interestingly, out of the 778 junior doctors who participated in the counselling session, only Halder, Mahato, and Naiya were denied their preferred postings.
The West Bengal Junior Doctor’s Front (WBJDF), the umbrella organization representing junior doctors in the state, has pledged to support Halder, Mahato, and Naiya in their fight against these arbitrary placements.
The three senior doctors clarified that their grievance revolves not around their distant postings but the complete absence of transparency in the posting allocation process. Their demands include justice for the victim of the R.G. Kar incident and a call for full transparency within the state’s medical administration system.
Point of View
This situation underscores the critical need for transparency and fairness within public service postings. The actions of these doctors not only reflect their personal grievances but also resonate with broader calls for accountability in medical administration. The public deserves clarity, and the voice of the medical community must be heard.
NationPress
08/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What prompted the doctors to approach the Calcutta High Court?
The doctors are challenging the alleged arbitrary nature of their postings, which they believe lack transparency and fairness.
What is the significance of their case?
Their case highlights the need for accountability and transparency in the medical posting process, impacting the entire medical community.
Who are the doctors involved in this legal battle?
The doctors involved are Debasish Halder, Asfaqulla Naiya, and potentially Aniket Mahato.
What support do the doctors have?
The West Bengal Junior Doctor's Front (WBJDF) has expressed its support for the doctors in their fight.
What are the doctors' main demands?
They seek justice for the victim of the R.G. Kar incident and full transparency in the posting process.
