Has the ECI Directed the CEO to Prevent Political Interference During Bengal SIR Hearings?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Kolkata, Jan 3 (NationPress) The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Saturday instructed the office of the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), West Bengal, to guarantee that there is no interference from booth-level agents (BLAs) or representatives of any political party during the current hearing sessions regarding the draft voters’ list in the state.
The hearings are a part of the second stage of the three-stage Special Intensive Revision (SIR) initiative in West Bengal.
This directive from the ECI followed recent events in Hooghly and Cooch Behar districts, where hearing sessions were reportedly interrupted and forcibly terminated due to the involvement of three Trinamool Congress legislators, including a senior member of the state Cabinet.
Sources indicate that these legislators insisted on the presence of their party’s BLAs during the hearing sessions, causing the disruptions.
The Commission has also advised the CEO’s office to instruct district magistrates and district electoral officers to take appropriate measures against similar interventions or attempts to disrupt hearing sessions in any district.
“In its directive to the CEO’s office, the Commission emphasized that removing BLAs or political interference from any party is crucial to uphold fairness, neutrality, and transparency in the hearing process,” stated a senior official from the CEO’s office.
Earlier this week, the ECI clarified its reasons for rejecting the Trinamool Congress’s request to permit party BLAs at the ongoing hearing sessions concerning claims and objections related to the draft voters’ list.
The Commission noted that conceding to such a request would necessitate allowing similar participation from all registered political parties in the state, which includes six national parties and two state parties.
In that scenario, each hearing table could potentially accommodate as many as 11 individuals — one Electoral Registration Officer (ERO), one Assistant Electoral Registration Officer (AERO), one micro-observer, and eight BLAs from different political parties.
“Permitting such a large number of participants at a single hearing table would render it nearly impossible for electoral officers to conduct the hearing process effectively. In practical terms, allowing BLAs to attend the hearing sessions is simply not feasible,” revealed an insider from the CEO’s office.