ED files PMLA chargesheet against Raheja Developers over ₹1,353 crore homebuyer fraud

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
ED files PMLA chargesheet against Raheja Developers over ₹1,353 crore homebuyer fraud

Synopsis

The ED has filed a sweeping 21-accused PMLA chargesheet against Raheja Developers and its promoter family, alleging ₹1,353.26 crore was siphoned from roughly 4,600 homebuyers who paid for flats that were never delivered. With non-bailable warrants sought, bail rejected twice, and ₹2,399.65 crore in assets attached, this is one of the largest real-estate money-laundering prosecutions in Delhi-NCR.

Key Takeaways

The ED filed a PMLA chargesheet on 6 November 2026 before the Special Court, Saket Courts, New Delhi against 21 accused , including Raheja Developers Ltd. and its promoter family. ₹1,353.26 crore of approximately ₹2,699.13 crore collected from around 4,600 homebuyers has been identified as proceeds of crime.
Funds were allegedly diverted out of project, escrow, and RERA accounts and moved through nominee-director shell entities to purchase land.
The ED has provisionally attached properties with a book value of ₹810.57 crore and a market value of ₹2,399.65 crore .
Non-bailable warrants have been sought against Navin M.
Singhania , and Nirmal Raheja , who have not joined the investigation.
Anticipatory bail for Nayan N.
Raheja was rejected by both the Special Court on 19 September and the Delhi High Court on 15 October .

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) on 6 November 2026 filed a chargesheet under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002 before the Special Court (PMLA), Saket Courts, New Delhi, against Raheja Developers Ltd. (RDL), its promoters, and 18 other individuals and entities, over the alleged laundering of approximately ₹1,353.26 crore collected from homebuyers. The prosecution complaint names 21 accused in total, including key family members of the group's managing director.

Who Is Accused and What They Are Charged With

The chargesheet, filed under Sections 44 and 45 of PMLA, names Raheja Developers Ltd., its Managing Director Navin M. Raheja, his son Nayan N. Raheja, daughter Nayana N. Singhania, wife Nirmal Raheja, and 16 other persons and entities. The accused are charged with money laundering as defined under Section 3 and punishable under Section 4 of the PMLA.

The ED investigation was triggered by multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) registered by the Economic Offences Wing, Delhi Police and Gurugram Police against RDL and its directors, following complaints from homebuyers who had paid for flats and commercial units in projects including Raheja Revanta, Atlantis, Navin Minar, and The Delhi Mall — and received neither possession nor refund.

Scale of the Alleged Fraud

According to the ED, RDL collected approximately ₹2,699.13 crore from around 4,600 homebuyers and investors across residential and commercial projects in Delhi and Gurugram, on the promise of timely delivery. Of this, ₹1,353.26 crore has so far been identified as proceeds of crime.

The breakdown, according to the agency, is ₹1,175.86 crore siphoned out of project, escrow, and RERA accounts for purposes other than construction, and ₹177.40 crore collected from homebuyers in cash outside registered agreements. Most projects of the group remain incomplete, the ED stated.

How the Money Was Allegedly Diverted

The investigation found that homebuyers' funds were diverted to group companies and to firms operated through employees and their relatives acting as nominee directors. The money was allegedly used to purchase land in the names of these shell-like entities and was moved through RERA accounts of one project to fund another — a pattern that the ED says masked the diversion trail.

Searches under Section 17 of PMLA were conducted at 14 premises on 27 June 2025 and at 9 premises on 25 April in Delhi-NCR, linked to RDL, its promoters, employees, and associated entities. Incriminating documents, digital devices, jewellery, gold coins, bullion, and foreign currency were seized, with their retention approved by the Adjudicating Authority (PMLA).

Attachments and Warrants

The ED has provisionally attached immovable properties with a book value of ₹810.57 crore and a current market value of ₹2,399.65 crore, through Provisional Attachment Orders dated 28 April and 30 July.

All four key family accused — Navin M. Raheja, Nayan N. Raheja, Nayana N. Singhania, and Nirmal Raheja — reportedly did not join the search proceedings and failed to comply with repeated summonses issued under Section 50 of PMLA. The ED has applied before the Special Court, Saket, for non-bailable warrants against all four. Notably, an anticipatory bail application by Nayan N. Raheja was dismissed by the Special Judge (PMLA), Saket Courts on 19 September, and again by the Delhi High Court on 15 October.

What Comes Next

The ED has sought confiscation of the attached properties and custody of the four promoters and family members as and when they are apprehended. With non-bailable warrants sought and bail avenues closed at both the Special Court and High Court levels, the case moves into an active arrest and trial phase. For the approximately 4,600 homebuyers still awaiting possession or refunds, the attachment of assets worth ₹2,399.65 crore at market value represents the most concrete step yet toward potential recovery.

Point of View

Ring-fenced project funds — can be systematically circumvented when enforcement is delayed and nominee structures are used to obscure the money trail. The fact that roughly 4,600 homebuyers paid in and received nothing across multiple projects, over multiple years, before an FIR was even filed, points to gaps in real-time regulatory oversight rather than just a failure of criminal law. The ED's attachment of assets worth ₹2,399.65 crore against a fraud of ₹1,353.26 crore is arithmetically encouraging, but realisation — converting attached book-value land into actual refunds — has historically been slow. The more consequential question is whether this prosecution accelerates delivery of pending projects or simply freezes them further, deepening the harm to the very buyers it seeks to protect.
NationPress
6 Nov 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the ED chargesheet against Raheja Developers about?
The ED has filed a PMLA chargesheet against Raheja Developers Ltd. and 20 co-accused, including the promoter family, alleging they laundered approximately ₹1,353.26 crore collected from around 4,600 homebuyers who paid for flats in projects like Raheja Revanta, Atlantis, Navin Minar, and The Delhi Mall but received neither possession nor refunds. The chargesheet was filed on 6 November 2026 before the Special Court (PMLA), Saket Courts, New Delhi.
How much money was allegedly diverted from homebuyers?
According to the ED, Raheja Developers collected approximately ₹2,699.13 crore from about 4,600 homebuyers and investors. Of this, ₹1,353.26 crore has been identified as proceeds of crime — ₹1,175.86 crore taken from project, escrow, and RERA accounts for non-construction purposes, and ₹177.40 crore collected in cash outside registered agreements.
Who are the main accused named in the chargesheet?
The chargesheet names 21 accused, including Raheja Developers Ltd. (RDL) and its Managing Director Navin M. Raheja, his son Nayan N. Raheja, daughter Nayana N. Singhania, wife Nirmal Raheja, and 16 other individuals and entities including several group companies and nominee-director firms.
What action has the ED taken on assets linked to Raheja Developers?
The ED has provisionally attached immovable properties with a book value of ₹810.57 crore and a current market value of ₹2,399.65 crore through orders dated 28 April and 30 July. The agency has also applied for non-bailable warrants against the four main family accused who have not joined the investigation.
What is the current status of bail for the Raheja promoters?
The anticipatory bail application of Nayan N. Raheja was dismissed by the Special Judge (PMLA), Saket Courts on 19 September, and by the Delhi High Court on 15 October. Non-bailable warrants have been sought against Navin M. Raheja, Nayan N. Raheja, Nayana N. Singhania, and Nirmal Raheja, all of whom have not complied with ED summonses.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 6 months ago
  5. 9 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google