Have Former Punjab CM Amarinder Singh and His Son Received ED Summons for FEMA Violations?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Chandigarh, Feb 12 (NationPress) The Enforcement Directorate has issued summons to BJP leader and former Chief Minister of Punjab, Capt Amarinder Singh, along with his son Raninder Singh, in connection with a Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) violation case dating back to 2016.
The father-son duo is accused of benefiting from specific foreign assets, including a Swiss bank account.
Capt Amarinder Singh is required to report to the ED at its Jalandhar office this Thursday, while his son will also attend on the same day.
However, Capt Amarinder Singh is expected to miss the appearance due to a recent knee replacement surgery at a private hospital in Mohali.
In a statement on X, his son Raninder Singh expressed, "As law-abiding citizens, we are committed to fully cooperating with every investigative agency. We have complete faith in the rule of law and believe that truth and justice will prevail."
This case traces back to 2016 when Amarinder Singh was part of the Congress party. Raninder Singh had previously been summoned by the ED on October 23, 2020, to clarify the alleged transfer of funds to Switzerland and the establishment of a trust in the British Virgin Islands tax haven.
The Income Tax Department had filed a charge sheet against both individuals in the Chief Judicial Magistrate's court in Ludhiana in 2016, alleging that Raninder Singh was the beneficiary of foreign assets managed through overseas business entities.
Additionally, the I-T Department claimed he was the beneficiary of foreign bank accounts held with HSBC Private Bank (SUISSE) SA in Geneva, Switzerland.
The agency accused Raninder Singh of misleading them by asserting he lacked documentation related to his family's income and foreign trusts. However, documents showed he was a 'settler' of the Jacaranda Trust, created in July 2005 in the British Virgin Islands, with HSBC Trust Company Limited acting as the trustee.
The father-son pair appealed against the Ludhiana court ruling at the Punjab and Haryana High Court, arguing that the income tax records contained "secret" information provided by the French Republic to the Government of India, which was protected under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
In a ruling in September 2025, the high court upheld the additional district judge's decision, stating it was "well-reasoned" and free from any legal errors.