Is the Eyewitness in the TN Custodial Death Case Safe? A Plea for Protection!

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Eyewitness Safety: The need for witness protection in custodial death cases is critical.
- Police Accountability: Arrests of involved officers highlight the call for accountability in law enforcement.
- Public Outcry: Widespread protests demonstrate the public's demand for justice and reform.
- Use of Technology: Mobile recordings can serve as vital evidence in legal cases.
- Systemic Change: The incident underscores the need for comprehensive reforms in policing practices.
Chennai, July 3 (NationPress) An essential witness in the suspected custodial death of temple security guard B. Ajith Kumar from Sivaganga district has contacted the Tamil Nadu Director General of Police (DGP) requesting police protection for himself and his family due to significant threats to their well-being.
M. Saktheeswaran (34), who is employed at the Adaikkalam Katha Ayyanar Badrakaliamman Temple in Thiruppuvanam, witnessed the savage police assault on Ajith Kumar, which occurred within the temple grounds in early June.
This attack reportedly resulted in Ajith’s custodial death, igniting widespread public outrage and a statewide discourse on police violence.
Saktheeswaran claims he recorded the event on his mobile device, capturing footage of uniformed officers brutally beating Ajith Kumar.
The video, which rapidly circulated on social media, became a pivotal piece of evidence submitted in court.
As a result of the incident, five police officials, including an inspector, were arrested and charged with murder.
In his communication to the DGP, Saktheeswaran expressed that he has been receiving threats and is apprehensive about retaliation, particularly from one of the suspended officers involved in the case, who reportedly has ties to history-sheeters and known criminals.
He emphasized that his involvement in revealing the custodial killing has made him a target, putting his family at risk as well.
“The court has already recognized the threat and instructed the state to guarantee my safety. Yet, I have not received any police protection to date,” he mentioned in his appeal.
He further insisted that the protection should not come from the Thiruppuvanam police station, where the implicated officers were formerly stationed, citing potential bias or intimidation.
The unfortunate incident occurred on June 12, when B. Ajith Kumar (27), a contract security guard at the temple, was allegedly apprehended by police on theft charges.
CCTV footage and witness accounts later confirmed that he was assaulted within the temple grounds before being transported to the Thiruppuvanam police station. He succumbed the following day, reportedly due to internal injuries.
This custodial death incited protests throughout Tamil Nadu, with human rights advocates, political parties, and the public demanding strict action against the officers involved.
The DGP’s office has yet to address Saktheeswaran’s recent request.