What Are the Gujjar Leaders Demanding at the Mahapanchayat in Bharatpur?

Click to start listening
What Are the Gujjar Leaders Demanding at the Mahapanchayat in Bharatpur?

Synopsis

Join the Gujjar community in Bharatpur as they unite for a Mahapanchayat to demand justice and their rightful share in government jobs. With the 17th anniversary of the 2008 movement approaching, will their voices finally be heard? Tune in to witness their passionate demonstration for change.

Key Takeaways

  • Mahapanchayat aims for 5% job reservation
  • Community leaders mobilizing support
  • 17th anniversary of 2008 movement
  • Police are on alert due to increased activity
  • Transparency demanded in government negotiations

Bharatpur, June 7 (NationPress) A faction of Gujjar leaders has organized a Mahapanchayat set for Sunday in Karwari village of Rajasthan's Bharatpur, aiming to advocate for their enduring demands, which include the thorough implementation of 5 percent reservation in government employment for their community.

To garner support, traditional yellow rice, symbolizing invitation, is being shared across 300 villages.

Led by Vijay Bainsla, president of the Gurjar Aarakshan Sangharsh Samiti, community leaders are actively visiting homes, encouraging attendance at the Mahapanchayat.

This gathering marks the 17th anniversary of the pivotal 2008 Gujjar movement.

In light of increased activity from Gujjar leaders, police and intelligence units have heightened their alertness, especially within Bharatpur and adjacent districts.

In a statement to the media, Bainsla declared, "We will not leave without achieving our rights. Should the government fail to respond, we will be compelled to initiate an agitation. It has been 17 years since the 2008 movement, and numerous key demands remain unresolved."

Bainsla emphasized that any forthcoming discussions with the government must occur publicly within the community's presence.

"No negotiations will take place behind closed doors. We have provided the government with our roadmap. If they wish to converse, it must be done transparently, with society watching," he stated.

One significant issue raised for protest is the ineffective execution of the Devnarayan Yojana, designed to facilitate educational and economic advancements for the Gujjar community.

"To us, the Devnarayan Yojana holds immense importance, yet its implementation is lacking. Our children are facing challenges in their education. Justice remains an unfulfilled promise from the 2008 agitation," Bainsla remarked.

With cautious optimism, Bainsla noted, "The Chief Minister has grown up among our people. I trust he will comprehend our struggles. However, the ultimate decision will rest with the community during the Mahapanchayat. The responsibility now lies with the Chief Minister."

Point of View

A call for transparency and open dialogue with the government emerges. The determination to secure long-overdue demands reflects a broader struggle for justice in India. It is imperative for all stakeholders to engage constructively, ensuring that the voices of the community are not just heard but acted upon.
NationPress
07/06/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main goal of the Mahapanchayat?
The primary goal of the Mahapanchayat is to demand the complete implementation of 5 percent reservation in government jobs for the Gujjar community.
Who is leading the Mahapanchayat?
The Mahapanchayat is being led by Vijay Bainsla, the president of the Gurjar Aarakshan Sangharsh Samiti.
Why is the 2008 Gujjar movement significant?
The 2008 Gujjar movement is significant as it was a pivotal moment in the community's ongoing struggle for rights and recognition, and the Mahapanchayat marks its 17th anniversary.
What concerns are being raised regarding the Devnarayan Yojana?
Concerns regarding the Devnarayan Yojana include its ineffective implementation, which is hindering educational and economic development for the Gujjar community.
What is the community's stance on future discussions with the government?
The community insists that any future discussions with the government must occur openly, with community members present, rather than in private meetings.