Is the Haryana Government Really a Protector of Criminals?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Senior Congress MP Randeep Singh Surjewala has vehemently criticized the Haryana government, accusing it of fostering a climate of fear and criminality. As allegations of a criminal-administration nexus surface, the state's safety and law enforcement effectiveness are in question. Will the Opposition hold the government accountable?
Key Takeaways
- Haryana government accused of protecting criminals.
- Rising incidents of organized crime and fear among citizens.
- Allegations of a criminal-administration nexus.
- Police effectiveness reportedly diminished.
- Public safety concerns heightened.
New Delhi, June 18 (NationPress) Senior Congress leader and Rajya Sabha MP, Randeep Singh Surjewala, strongly criticized the Haryana government, labeling it as a “protector of criminals” and accusing it of neglecting law and order within the state.
Referencing a recent media investigation concerning the alleged criminal-administration connection in Haryana, Surjewala stated that the BJP-led government has transformed the state into a nexus of organized crime, mafia activities, and rampant lawlessness under Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini's leadership.
On the social media platform X, Surjewala expressed, “Under BJP’s rule, criminals roam free while the public lives in fear. Haryana’s image has deteriorated to that of a gangster state, where mafias, thugs, and criminals dictate terms while police and administration look the other way.”
He indicated that incidents of extortion, murders in broad daylight, and threats have now become commonplace, with police efficiency significantly diminishing.
“The law and order situation in Haryana has entirely disintegrated. Gangsters are operating even from within jails, which are now akin to their personal offices,” he remarked.
“Criminals based overseas are now orchestrating crimes in Haryana through their accomplices. Social media is being exploited to instill fear, and extortion has become a lucrative business under the Saini administration,” Surjewala added.
He accused the BJP government of providing tacit support to criminals, enabling a parallel regime of mafia control.
“Haryana is no longer a safe haven. The average citizen lives under a cloud of fear. Crime has evolved into a more sophisticated, organized, and emboldened enterprise due to political backing,” he emphasized.
Pointing to a media report, he claimed it reveals the alleged connection between criminals and the ruling party.
While the Haryana government has yet to respond to Surjewala’s allegations, it is anticipated that the Opposition will bring this issue to light in the near future.
It is noteworthy that Haryana's CM Nayab Singh Saini chaired a high-level meeting on Tuesday to assess the law and order situation and the ongoing excise auctions in the state.
Point of View
We recognize the importance of maintaining public safety and the integrity of law enforcement. The allegations made by Congress MP Surjewala highlight critical concerns regarding governance and criminal activity in Haryana. It is essential for the government to address these claims transparently in order to restore public trust and ensure the safety of its citizens.
NationPress
18/06/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What accusations did Surjewala make against the Haryana government?
Surjewala accused the Haryana government of being a 'protector of criminals' and failing to uphold law and order, alleging a nexus between criminals and the administration.
What specific issues did he highlight?
He pointed out the rise in organized crime, extortion, daylight murders, and a general atmosphere of fear among the public in Haryana.
How did Surjewala describe the current law and order situation?
He described it as completely collapsed, with gangsters operating freely, even from within jails.
What is the government's response to these claims?
As of now, the Haryana government has not publicly responded to Surjewala's allegations.
What actions are expected from the Opposition?
The Opposition is likely to raise these concerns in upcoming sessions, demanding accountability from the government.
