What Landmark Bill Did HM Shah Introduce for Removal of Jailed PMs, CMs, and Ministers in Lok Sabha?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Automatic removal of elected officials proposed for serious criminal charges.
- Legal framework established for accountability in governance.
- Provisions for removal by President, Governor, and Lieutenant-Governor.
- Significant political debate anticipated as bills move to committee review.
- Public trust and constitutional morality emphasized by HM Shah.
New Delhi, Aug 20 (NationPress) Union Home Minister Amit Shah presented three significant bills in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday, including the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025. This bill advocates for the automatic removal of elected officials, such as Prime Ministers, Chief Ministers, and Union Ministers, if they are arrested and held for 30 consecutive days due to serious criminal allegations.
The proposed legislation, alongside the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025 and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025, was referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee after a voice vote.
The House was then adjourned until 5 p.m.
The Constitution Amendment Bill aims to amend Articles 75, 164, and 239AA, establishing a legal framework that necessitates the removal of ministers in custody for crimes carrying sentences of five years or more.
According to the provisions, the President will be responsible for removing the Prime Minister, the Governor will remove Chief Ministers, and the Lieutenant-Governor will remove Chief Ministers of Union Territories.
If no resignation or removal advice is provided by the 31st day, the office will automatically become vacant on the 32nd day, though reappointment is allowed following release from custody.
In his statement to Lok Sabha members, HM Shah stressed that elected officials must exemplify public trust and constitutional integrity.
He asserted that their actions should be beyond reproach, prioritizing public welfare over political motives.
The introduction of the bills faced opposition from members who insisted on discussing the Special Intensive Revision of voter rolls in Bihar.
Speaker Om Birla rebuked the protesting MPs, stating, "Such behaviour is unacceptable. The entire nation is observing your actions as parliamentarians."
He called for decorum and highlighted the ethical purpose behind the bills before allowing their introduction, but the opposition members continued to disrupt the proceedings.
Subsequently, Speaker Birla adjourned the House until 5 p.m.
As the bills move towards committee evaluation, they have sparked a national dialogue regarding accountability, ethical governance, and the balance between executive power and constitutional protections.