Will Meeting with Punjab Resolve SYL Water Share Issues?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Chandigarh's former Chief Minister, Bhupinder Singh Hooda, argues that the upcoming Central government meeting on the Sutlej Yamuna Link canal is futile for Haryana's water rights. He calls for a contempt of court case against the BJP government due to its failure to fulfill the Supreme Court's ruling regarding water allocation.
Key Takeaways
- Hooda calls for contempt of court action.
- Supreme Court previously favored Haryana's water rights.
- Farmers face fertilizer shortages impacting crops.
- BJP government criticized for inaction.
- Ongoing disputes affect farmers’ livelihoods.
Chandigarh, July 8 (NationPress) One day before the Central government convenes a meeting concerning the Sutlej Yamuna Link (SYL) canal, former Chief Minister of Haryana, Bhupinder Singh Hooda, stated on Tuesday that the BJP-led state government ought to initiate a contempt of court action, as convening a meeting will not aid in securing the rightful share of water.
Reacting to the fourth round of discussions between the chief ministers of Punjab and Haryana, Hooda emphasized that the BJP administration should move past these meetings since the Supreme Court had long ago ruled in favor of Haryana.
"The court assigned the obligation of delivering Haryana's water share to the Central government. The BJP governs both in Haryana and at the national level. Given this scenario, Haryana should have already received its water allocation. However, due to the BJP's anti-Haryana stance, this has not materialized. If the government is discussing this now, it should directly pursue a contempt of court action,” remarked the two-time Chief Minister.
Addressing media inquiries, he criticized the BJP government for once again having "failed" to supply fertilizers to farmers punctually.
"Farmers are once more compelled to abandon their fields, standing in endless queues. The unavailability of DAP has left farmers in despair, risking damage to their crops," Hooda lamented.
He voiced his worries regarding the DAP shortage, highlighting that farmers are enduring the compounded effects of the BJP's dual-engine government, both at the national and state levels.
"Haryana is set to receive around 14 lakh metric tonnes of fertilizers from the Centre, but the current situation indicates that less than half of this amount has been provided thus far," he specified.
"As a result, despite waiting in queues from dawn till dusk, farmers often return empty-handed. Each season, the government seems to intentionally create conditions that drive farmers to protest on the streets," he added.
Point of View
It is evident that the ongoing water dispute between Punjab and Haryana highlights significant governance issues. The call for a contempt of court case reflects the frustrations of the Haryana government, which has been grappling with its water allocation rights. Ensuring farmers have access to necessary resources like fertilizers should be paramount, as their livelihoods depend on timely support from the government.
NationPress
16/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Sutlej Yamuna Link canal issue?
The Sutlej Yamuna Link (SYL) canal issue pertains to the allocation of water between the states of Punjab and Haryana, with Haryana seeking its rightful share as mandated by the Supreme Court.
Why does Hooda believe the meeting is pointless?
Hooda argues that the meeting will not resolve the water allocation issues, as the Supreme Court has already ruled in favor of Haryana, and urges the government to take legal action instead.
What are the current challenges faced by Haryana farmers?
Farmers in Haryana are struggling with fertilizer shortages, particularly DAP, which threatens their crop production and forces them to wait in long queues for supplies.
What has been the government's response to the situation?
Hooda criticizes the BJP government for failing to deliver fertilizers on time and for not taking adequate steps to secure Haryana's water rights.
How does the water dispute impact farmers?
The water dispute directly affects farmers' access to irrigation, which is vital for their crops, leading to potential economic losses and increased protests for their rights.
