Did the IIM-Calcutta 'rape' victim skip her trial?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
The case involving the alleged rape of a woman at IIM-Calcutta takes a perplexing turn as she skips her trial appearance. With conflicting statements between the victim and her father, the trial is shrouded in confusion. What will this mean for the ongoing investigation?
Key Takeaways
- Victim's absence raises questions about the trial.
- Contradictory statements from the victim and her father complicate the case.
- Importance of police ensuring victim presence in court.
- Trial ongoing amidst public scrutiny.
- The need for clarity in sensitive legal matters.
Kolkata, July 14 (NationPress) The woman who became the victim of ‘rape’ on the campus of the Indian Institute of Management- Calcutta (IIM-C) in Joka, located on the outskirts of South Kolkata, did not appear at the trial court on Monday to have her statements recorded before a judicial magistrate.
As of now, no explanation has been provided for her absence at the trial court.
On that day, following the victim's nonappearance, the counsel for the accused argued that it was the police's responsibility to ensure the victim's presence in court. Consequently, the judge requested a report from the police regarding the situation.
Her absence has only added to the existing confusion and contradictions in the case that investigators are striving to clarify.
One significant issue is the conflicting statements made by both the victim and her father.
The victim stated that the accused invited her to the boys’ hostel on Friday evening for counseling, where he allegedly offered her pizza and drinks that were laced with sedatives. She claims that after eating the pizza, she lost consciousness and was subsequently raped by the accused, Parmanand, in the hostel.
In stark contrast, the victim’s father has publicly asserted that nothing of that nature occurred, insisting that she became unconscious after falling from a vehicle. He maintained this position even as a trial court remanded the accused into police custody until July 19.
During the proceedings, the public prosecutor emphasized the need to investigate the father’s statements, which contradict those of his daughter, highlighting the necessity for clarity regarding his conflicting claims on such a critical matter.
Point of View
It is imperative to analyze the unfolding situation at IIM-Calcutta with impartiality. The contradictions in this case underscore the complexities of legal proceedings, especially in sensitive matters such as allegations of sexual assault. Our commitment to journalistic integrity remains steadfast as we seek the truth.
NationPress
14/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What happened at IIM-Calcutta?
A woman reported being raped at IIM-Calcutta, but she did not appear in court to give her statements.
Why did the victim skip the trial?
No explanation has been provided for the victim's absence at the trial court.
What are the conflicting statements?
The victim claims she was raped after being drugged, while her father insists she fell unconscious after an accident.
What is the next step in the trial?
The judge has requested a police report regarding the victim's absence.
How has the case affected the community?
The case has raised concerns about safety and the handling of sexual assault allegations within educational institutions.
