Is India Shifting Its Anti-Terror Strategy?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a bold declaration, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has introduced a five-point anti-terror strategy redefining India's response to cross-border terrorism. This new doctrine emphasizes a zero-tolerance approach, asserting that dialogue and terrorism cannot coexist. Discover how this shift marks a critical turning point in India's national security policy.
Key Takeaways
- New anti-terror strategy emphasizes zero tolerance.
- Direct responses to cross-border attacks are mandated.
- No dialogue with Pakistan unless focused on terrorism.
- Political unity is essential for a robust response.
- India will not succumb to nuclear threats.
New Delhi, July 28 (NationPress) External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has detailed a significant transformation in India's approach to cross-border terrorism, dubbing it a “new normal” that allows no compromise on national security.
During a special session in the Lok Sabha regarding Operation Sindoor on Monday, Jaishankar presented a five-point framework that redefines India's stance on Pakistan-sponsored terrorism.
“This is not business as usual anymore,” Jaishankar stated.
“Operation Sindoor marks a pivotal moment. We are moving beyond strategic restraint - we are establishing new terms.”
He elaborated on this changing doctrine: Terrorists will no longer be regarded as proxies, cross-border assaults will incur direct and fitting responses, dialogue will only occur on terrorism - peace talks and terror cannot coexist, India will not yield to nuclear threats, and friendly relations are incompatible with terrorism - blood and water cannot flow together.
Jaishankar emphasized that these principles will direct all future interactions with Pakistan, indicating a firm national security posture.
Amid discussions about external mediation, Jaishankar firmly dismissed any notion that the U.S. played a role in alleviating tensions between India and Pakistan following the Pahalgam terror incident.
"Let me be unequivocally clear - Washington had no involvement in de-escalating the situation in May," he asserted.
He clarified that during that time, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and then-U.S. President Donald Trump communicated only twice: first on April 22, the day of the Pahalgam attack, and again on June 17 while PM Modi was in Canada.
“There was no call in between,” he said, dispelling any idea of American influence.
Jaishankar also refuted claims that trade discussions were connected to the conflict or factored into any exchanges between India and the U.S. during that period.
He highlighted the importance of political unity within India in combating terrorism.
“We will only achieve zero tolerance against terrorism if we have a unified voice at home,” he stated, calling on opposition parties to transcend partisanship.
He pointed out the conduct of Indian parliamentary delegations abroad as a standard.
“They stood united while engaging with foreign governments during Operation Sindoor. I hope that same spirit is reflected here in this House,” he noted.
Point of View
It is imperative to recognize the significance of S. Jaishankar's announcement regarding India's new anti-terror strategy. This comprehensive approach demonstrates a commitment to national security and a call for unity among political factions. It is vital for the nation to present a united front against terrorism to ensure the safety and stability of our homeland.
NationPress
30/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What is India's new anti-terror strategy?
India's new anti-terror strategy, outlined by External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, consists of a five-point doctrine focusing on zero tolerance towards terrorism, ensuring direct responses to cross-border attacks, and refusing dialogue with Pakistan unless it pertains to terrorism.
How does this strategy impact India-Pakistan relations?
The new strategy indicates a firm stance against Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, suggesting that future engagements will be guided by strict principles, thereby complicating diplomatic relations unless terrorism is addressed.
What does 'blood and water cannot flow together' mean?
'Blood and water cannot flow together' implies that peaceful relations cannot coexist with acts of terrorism, emphasizing India's resolve to maintain security while engaging with neighbors.
Is there any foreign involvement in this strategy?
Jaishankar firmly rejected claims of U.S. involvement in de-escalating tensions between India and Pakistan, stating that the government will independently address its national security issues.
What role does political unity play in combating terrorism?
Jaishankar stressed that achieving zero tolerance against terrorism requires a unified political voice in India, urging all parties to rise above partisanship for a collective response.
