Racial abuse video: Influencer Amir Shokeen gets 5-day police custody
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Social media influencer Amir Shokeen was on Saturday, 25 October 2026 sent to five days of police custody by the Tis Hazari Court in New Delhi, in connection with a racial harassment and humiliation case involving a man from Tripura, captured in a video that spread widely on social media platforms. The court's order came after Shokeen's one-day judicial custody — granted the previous day — expired.
What the Court Ordered
The Tis Hazari Court heard arguments from both the prosecution and the defence before granting five days of police custody. Investigators told the court they still needed to recover a mobile phone linked to the case and travel to Ahmedabad as part of the probe. The defence counsel noted that the precise location of the phone in Ahmedabad had not yet been established.
How the Arrest Unfolded
Delhi Police arrested Shokeen from the Karol Bagh area on Thursday. He was initially placed in one-day judicial custody by the Tis Hazari Court on Friday, and was produced again on Saturday when the extended police custody was granted. According to investigators, the controversial video was reportedly made approximately one month ago.
Shokeen's Defence and Prior Apology
Following the video's circulation and the public backlash it triggered, Shokeen issued an apology. In a Facebook post, he claimed the video was scripted and that the man seen in it was known to him personally — reportedly a former employee at a friend's café in Ahmedabad. He described the clip as a humorous exchange in which both individuals were joking, and stated he had no intention of insulting anyone based on their background.
Shokeen's Prior Legal Record
This is not the first time Amir Shokeen has faced police action. Earlier cases under Sections 323, 324, 504, and 506 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) had been registered against him, according to officials. The latest arrest has drawn fresh attention to the accountability of social media influencers for content that targets individuals on grounds of regional or ethnic identity.
Broader Context
The case comes amid growing concerns about racially charged content targeting people from Northeast India, a region whose residents frequently report discrimination and mockery in cities across the country. Advocacy groups and Northeast diaspora communities have increasingly demanded stronger legal action against such content creators. The investigation's next steps, including the Ahmedabad visit, are expected to determine the full circumstances of the video's production.