Is the Wait for a Genuine GST 2.0 Over?

Click to start listening
Is the Wait for a Genuine GST 2.0 Over?

Synopsis

Congress MP Jairam Ramesh has expressed strong concerns over the recently proposed GST changes, labeling them as insufficient and questioning their impact on the economy. The demand for a comprehensive GST 2.0 persists as he highlights the need for significant reforms.

Key Takeaways

  • GST 2.0 criticized for not addressing state concerns.
  • Congress labels changes as GST 1.5.
  • Calls for a simplified tax structure.
  • Need for better support for MSMEs.
  • State compensation remains a key issue.

New Delhi, Sep 4 (NationPress) Congress MP Jairam Ramesh has strongly criticized GST 2.0, asserting that it does not adequately address the issues and requests of the states, and that the quest for a true GST 2.0 continues.

He alleged that the government has overlooked revenue compensation, leaving the reform process incomplete.

The Congress leader referred to the announcement as “GST 1.5” and questioned whether the adjustments would genuinely benefit the economy.

He emphasized that his party has long been advocating for a GST 2.0 that simplifies the tax structure by reducing the number of rates, lowering rates on numerous essential items, minimizing tax evasion, eliminating misclassification and disputes, addressing the inverted duty structure (where output tax is lower than input tax), easing compliance burdens for MSMEs, and broadening GST coverage.

Ramesh challenged the effectiveness of the GST Council, questioning if it has been relegated to a mere formal entity, citing earlier remarks by Prime Minister Narendra Modi during his speech on August 15.

“The Union Finance Minister made significant announcements last evening following the GST Council meeting, which is a constitutional body. However, prior to the GST Council meeting, the Prime Minister had already disclosed the essence of its resolutions in his Independence Day address on August 15, 2025. Is the GST Council to be diminished to a formality?” the Congress MP expressed on his social media platform.

He remarked that the Finance Minister has finally acknowledged that GST 1.0 had reached an impasse, faced with a decline in private consumption, lackluster private investment, and ongoing classification disputes.

“In fact, the architecture of GST 1.0 was fundamentally flawed, a point the INC highlighted back in July 2017, when the PM opted to implement GST. It was intended to be a Good and Simple Tax but ended up being a Growth Suppressing Tax,” Ramesh noted in his statement.

The Congress general secretary overseeing communications mentioned that the recent announcements have gained attention since the PM had set pre-Diwali deadlines.

“Presumably, the advantages of rate reductions will be transferred to consumers. Nevertheless, the anticipation for a genuine GST 2.0 continues. Whether this updated GST 1.5, if such a term is applicable, stimulates private investment - particularly in manufacturing - remains to be observed. Whether this will alleviate the pressures on MSMEs is yet to be determined,” he asserted.

Ramesh, while critiquing the government, highlighted the issue of state compensation. “One crucial demand from the states, made in the true spirit of cooperative federalism — the extension of compensation for another five years to fully safeguard their revenues — remains unresolved. This demand has grown even more significant at this juncture.”

Point of View

It's clear that the ongoing discussions surrounding GST reforms are crucial for economic stability. The concerns raised by Congress highlight significant issues that must be addressed to ensure a balanced approach that truly benefits both the states and the economy as a whole.
NationPress
04/09/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main criticisms of GST 2.0?
Critics, including Congress MP Jairam Ramesh, argue that GST 2.0 fails to address key state concerns and lacks adequate revenue compensation, leaving it incomplete.
What does Jairam Ramesh mean by GST 1.5?
Ramesh refers to the recent GST changes as GST 1.5, indicating that they are insufficient and do not fulfill the comprehensive reform needed for a true GST 2.0.
Why is the GST Council's role questioned?
Ramesh questions whether the GST Council has been reduced to a formality, citing prior announcements by the Prime Minister that disclosed the decisions before the council's meeting.
What reforms does Congress advocate for in GST 2.0?
Congress seeks a GST 2.0 that simplifies the tax structure, reduces rates on consumer goods, and eases compliance for MSMEs while addressing various classification disputes.
What is the significance of state compensation in the GST discussion?
The demand for extending state compensation for another five years is vital for ensuring that states can maintain their revenue levels, especially amid ongoing economic challenges.