Jaipur Police dismisses 4 constables for skipping election duty
Synopsis
Jaipur Police Commissioner Sachin Mittal has dismissed four recruit constables — identified by name and badge number — for prolonged unauthorised absence and skipping election duty despite direct orders. The move is a pointed signal that dereliction during constitutional assignments carries career-ending consequences in the Jaipur commissionerate.
Key Takeaways
Jaipur Police Commissioner Sachin Mittal dismissed four recruit constables on 30 October 2026 for unauthorised absence and failure to report for election duty.
The dismissed personnel are Lokesh Kashyap (No.
10033), Vijay Singh (No.
4049), Mohri Lal (No.
7997), and Bajrang Lal (No.
Formal dismissal orders were issued by Deputy Commissioner of Police (HQ) Anushtha Kalia .
Commissioner Mittal described skipping election duty as an act of serious indiscipline that cannot be overlooked.
The action is intended to reinforce accountability across the Jaipur Police Commissionerate .
Jaipur Police Commissioner Sachin Mittal has dismissed four recruit constables from service after they remained absent without authorisation for an extended period and failed to report for critical assignments, including election duty, despite receiving explicit departmental orders. The formal dismissal orders were issued on 30 October 2026 by Deputy Commissioner of Police (Headquarters) Anushtha Kalia.
Who Was Dismissed
The four personnel removed from service have been identified as Lokesh Kashyap (Recruit Constable No. 10033), Vijay Singh (Recruit Constable No. 4049), Mohri Lal (Recruit Constable No. 7997), and Bajrang Lal (Recruit Constable No. 7346). According to the police, all four had been absent from duty for a prolonged period without obtaining official permission and had disregarded clear instructions to report for election-related deployment.
What the Commissioner Said
Commissioner Mittal stated that discipline is the highest priority within the police force and that every personnel member must comply with official orders and discharge their responsibilities with accountability. He described failure to report for election duty as an act of serious indiscipline. Mittal further noted that unauthorised absence by police personnel compromises not only operational arrangements but also the broader efficiency and discipline of the force.
Why Election Duty Absence Is Treated Severely
Election-related deployments carry heightened legal and administrative weight under Indian law. Police personnel assigned to election duty are considered part of a constitutional process, and dereliction in this context is typically treated as a graver offence than routine absence. The Jaipur Police Commissionerate reiterated that maintaining discipline and accountability is essential for the effective discharge of public responsibilities, particularly during critical law-and-order operations.
Signal to the Force
The action is being read within the commissionerate as a deliberate message that negligence, prolonged unauthorised absence, and disregard for official orders will invite strict disciplinary consequences. This comes amid a broader emphasis by police leadership across Rajasthan on tightening administrative accountability ahead of and during electoral cycles. The dismissals serve as a precedent within the Jaipur commissionerate that rank offers no immunity from disciplinary action when fundamental duties are neglected.
Point of View
But the public naming of badge numbers signals something deliberate — this is deterrence, not just process. The timing matters: police forces across Rajasthan are under pressure to demonstrate discipline in the run-up to electoral cycles, and a commissionerate-level action of this kind sets a visible precedent. What mainstream coverage tends to underplay is the structural problem it points to — if constables are routinely absent without consequences, the force's operational reliability during elections is genuinely at risk. Whether four dismissals change that culture or merely satisfy the optics of accountability is the harder question.
NationPress
31 Oct 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
Why were four Jaipur Police constables dismissed from service?
The four recruit constables were dismissed for prolonged unauthorised absence and for failing to report for important assignments, including election duty, despite receiving explicit departmental orders. Jaipur Police Commissioner Sachin Mittal ordered their removal, describing the conduct as serious indiscipline.
Who are the constables dismissed by Jaipur Police?
The dismissed personnel are Lokesh Kashyap (Recruit Constable No. 10033), Vijay Singh (Recruit Constable No. 4049), Mohri Lal (Recruit Constable No. 7997), and Bajrang Lal (Recruit Constable No. 7346). All four were recruit constables in the Jaipur Police Commissionerate.
Who issued the formal dismissal orders?
The formal dismissal orders were issued by Deputy Commissioner of Police (Headquarters) Anushtha Kalia, acting on the directions of Police Commissioner Sachin Mittal.
Why is missing election duty treated as a serious offence?
Election duty is a constitutionally significant assignment, and police personnel deployed for it are part of ensuring the lawful conduct of elections. Absence without authorisation during such duty is treated as a graver disciplinary offence than routine dereliction, as it directly affects law-and-order arrangements.
What message does the Jaipur Police Commissionerate intend with these dismissals?
The commissionerate has stated that the action is meant to signal that negligence, prolonged unauthorised absence, and disregard for official orders will carry strict disciplinary consequences. It has reiterated that discipline and accountability are essential for the effective functioning of the force.
