Why Has the Jharkhand HC Summoned the Health Secretary and RIMS Director?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Jharkhand High Court summons key health officials.
- Severe staffing shortages at RIMS.
- Public Interest Litigation raises critical issues.
- Government's failure to address vacancies criticized.
- Call for accountability in healthcare management.
Ranchi, Aug 5 (NationPress) The High Court of Jharkhand has summoned both the state Health Secretary and the Director of the Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), the leading health institution in the state, to attend in person on Wednesday due to the alarming state of the hospital.
During a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) hearing on Tuesday, a division bench led by Chief Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Justice Rajesh Shankar expressed serious concern, instructing both officials to present themselves on August 6 and furnish a comprehensive explanation.
The PIL underscored persistent vacancies in vital roles—doctors, faculty, technical staff, and Group D personnel—as well as a significant deficiency in critical medical equipment.
The court criticized the state government's actions, questioning: “If critical appointments are not being made at a prestigious institution like RIMS, how can the health of ordinary citizens be ensured?”
Expressing dissatisfaction with the protracted delays in staff recruitment, the court was unimpressed by the explanation that despite regular funding for RIMS, the institution has been returning unused funds.
The court characterized this situation as a case of “policy negligence” and condemned the authorities for their administrative indifference.
The PIL was initiated by social worker Jyoti Sharma. Her attorney, advocate Deepak Dubey, informed the court that numerous essential positions remain unfilled across the dental college, nursing college, and paramedical department of RIMS.
In the dental college alone, there are 37 vacant positions for professors, 9 for additional professors, 56 for associate professors, and 43 for assistant professors. The nursing college is short of 144 Group-C nursing staff, 44 paramedical personnel, and 418 Group-D employees.
The court also criticized doctors who receive a non-practicing allowance while allegedly continuing to engage in private practice, contrary to service regulations.
Reports indicate that several doctors operate private clinics while receiving this allowance, and some even have fixed hours at hospitals yet maintain outside practices.
Taking this matter seriously, the court has instructed the RIMS Director to present a complete report of biometric attendance records for all such doctors at the next hearing.