Has Kerala HC Ordered the Return of Gold-Plated Panels from Sabarimala Temple?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a major development, the Kerala High Court has ordered the immediate return of gold-plated panels from Sabarimala temple, raising questions about temple administration and the handling of sacred assets. With further hearings on the horizon, the spotlight is on the Travancore Devaswom Board and their decision-making process.
Key Takeaways
- The Kerala High Court has ordered the return of gold-plated panels from Sabarimala.
- The Travancore Devaswom Board faces scrutiny over its actions.
- Judicial directives must be followed in temple administration.
- The economic implications of gold management in temples are significant.
- Public transparency is vital in managing sacred assets.
Kochi, Sep 10 (NationPress) In a significant setback for the Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB), the Kerala High Court has mandated the immediate return of the gold-plated panels that were taken from the 'Dwarapalaka' (guardian) sculptures located at the entrance of the sanctum sanctorum of Sabarimala and were sent to Chennai.
This ruling was issued in response to a petition regarding the removal of the gold-plated sheets for necessary repair work.
The court, clearly displeased with the situation, expressed strong criticism towards the TDB, pointing out that such actions had ignored established judicial orders.
A report submitted by the Special Commissioner indicated that the removal of the gold plating was conducted without prior court approval, thus breaching earlier directives that stipulated all gold-related work at the shrine should only be performed at the Sannidhanam and strictly under the supervision of court-appointed officials.
The Special Commissioner labeled this oversight as a serious violation of protocol.
This incident has sparked renewed controversy surrounding temple administration.
In response to the uproar that emerged on Tuesday, TDB President P.S. Prashanth defended the decision, claiming it was made with the consent of the temple Thantri (chief priest).
“The sculptures had visible tarnish, scratches, and even cracks on the legs. Repairs were urgent before the upcoming Mandalam season. The removal was carried out in the presence of the Thiruvabharanam Commissioner and Vigilance officials,” he stated.
The controversy has reignited discussions about the economic value of aged gold.
Some argue that exposure to the elements enhances its worth, raising concerns that even if the same weight of gold is returned, hidden financial benefits could result.
This is not the first instance where Sabarimala has been subjected to such scrutiny.
Previous allegations of irregularities arose when the temple roof was dismantled and re-plated with gold, with critics questioning the transparency in managing temple assets.
With the court now demanding the prompt return of the panels and scheduling further hearings, this episode has once again placed the TDB’s decision-making under intense legal and public scrutiny.
Point of View
I believe the recent Kerala HC ruling emphasizes the need for transparency and adherence to judicial directives in temple administration. The public's interest in the management of sacred assets must be balanced with respect for traditions, ensuring that such incidents do not undermine the sanctity of revered sites.
NationPress
10/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did the Kerala High Court intervene in this matter?
The Kerala High Court intervened following a petition regarding the unauthorized removal of gold-plated panels from Sabarimala temple, which breached previous judicial directives.
What is the significance of the gold-plated panels?
The gold-plated panels are integral to the temple's aesthetics and are symbols of its cultural and spiritual heritage, hence their management is crucial.
Who is responsible for the temple's administration?
The Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB) is responsible for the administration of Sabarimala temple.
What are the implications of this ruling?
This ruling puts the TDB's decision-making processes under scrutiny and raises questions about the transparency and management of temple assets.
Has this happened before at Sabarimala?
Yes, Sabarimala has faced scrutiny previously over allegations of irregularities, particularly concerning the handling of gold-related work.
